pdarnowsky

pdarnowsky

The Ray Tracer Challenge: use of a type code (pg. 3-4)

@jamis

After introducing the ideas of tuples, vectors, and points, the book goes on to say:

But looking at (4, -4, 3) and (-4, 4, -3) , it’s impossible to know that one is a point
and the other is a vector. Let’s add a fourth component to these (x, y, z) tuples,
called w , to help us tell them apart. Set w to 1 for points, and 0 for vectors.
Thus, your point becomes (4, -4, 3, 1) , and your vector becomes (-4, 4, -3, 0) .
Now, the choice of 0 or 1 for w probably seems arbitrary just now, but sit
tight! It’ll make more sense when you get to Chapter 3, Matrices, on page 25,
where it turns out to be rather important for multiplying matrices and tuples.

This advice seems misguided to me, as it amounts to using the fourth component as a type code, and not even a symbolic one–you just have to remember that 1.0 in the fourth component means a vector and 0.0 indicates a point. Especially given that this book appears to be aimed towards fairly junior developers, that’s not a practice we should be encouraging.

I agree that it’s necessary to differentiate between vectors and points, and the best way to do it depends largely on the language you’re using. That said, every mainstream language that I know of has a better way to do that than what is suggested here.

First Post!

srmo

srmo

@jamis

I feel this. But let me give my two cents. I’m coding in Java.
I’ve just started the book today and got stuck when it came to implementation of the different operations on Tuples, Points and Vectors.

TL;DR: in the end, the current description in the book allows for two main points:

  • it has me thinking really hard on what the best approach is. And in the spirit of TDD, I came to the realisation that the stage I’m in now needs me to not overthink all of that too early and go with the flow and trust the process.
  • the loose description gives you the full freedom. Sticking to only point and vector is a too narrow view. Using Tuple with the convenient “w” component allows for a broader understanding of the underlying mechanisms

Here’s a more detailed description of what happened to me:
I’ve started immediately with a type system, Tuple, Point and Vector. Now, may it be to language restrictions or inherently complex design, implementing the different rules per Type seemed to create an enormous mess. I.e. is Tuple allowed to add two “points” but the Point type isn’t? Does each type need an extra implementation to return the correct type, depending on the operation (e.g. returning a vector when adding point+vector)?
Does every type have to implement this? The inheritence tree looks like garbage after a few tries.
From my point of view: using narrow types requires much more design skill from a beginner developer and is more prone to end up in a mess that is really hard to refactor your way out of.
Using a “flag” on a single type is way easier for the initial design.

My current solution is to just stick to the Tuple type with some convenience methods. This is clean and I expect most flexibility with this approach.

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

JohnS
I can’t setup the Rails source code. This happens in a working directory containing multiple (postgres) Rails apps. With: ruby-3.0.0 s...
New
herminiotorres
Hi! I know not the intentions behind this narrative when called, on page XI: mount() |> handle_event() |> render() but the correc...
New
rmurray10127
Title: Intuitive Python: docker run… denied error (page 2) Attempted to run the docker command in both CLI and Powershell PS C:\Users\r...
New
gilesdotcodes
In case this helps anyone, I’ve had issues setting up the rails source code. Here were the solutions: In Gemfile, change gem 'rails' t...
New
New
swlaschin
The book has the same “Problem space/Solution space” diagram on page 18 as is on page 17. The correct Problem/Solution space diagrams ar...
New
jgchristopher
“The ProductLive.Index template calls a helper function, live_component/3, that in turn calls on the modal component. ” Excerpt From: Br...
New
AufHe
I’m a newbie to Rails 7 and have hit an issue with the bin/Dev script mentioned on pages 112-113. Iteration A1 - Seeing the list of prod...
New
andreheijstek
After running /bin/setup, the first error was: The foreman' command exists in these Ruby versions: That was easy to fix: gem install fore...
New
redconfetti
Docker-Machine became part of the Docker Toolbox, which was deprecated in 2020, long after Docker Desktop supported Docker Engine nativel...
New

Other popular topics Top

New
ohm
Which, if any, games do you play? On what platform? I just bought (and completed) Minecraft Dungeons for my Nintendo Switch. Other than ...
New
axelson
I’ve been really enjoying obsidian.md: It is very snappy (even though it is based on Electron). I love that it is all local by defaul...
New
Exadra37
I am thinking in building or buy a desktop computer for programing, both professionally and on my free time, and my choice of OS is Linux...
New
AstonJ
poll poll Be sure to check out @Dusty’s article posted here: An Introduction to Alternative Keyboard Layouts It’s one of the best write-...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Build efficient applications that exploit the unique benefits of a pure functional language, learning from an engineer who uses Haskell t...
New
New
New
CommunityNews
A Brief Review of the Minisforum V3 AMD Tablet. Update: I have created an awesome-minisforum-v3 GitHub repository to list information fo...
New
RobertRichards
Hair Salon Games for Girls Fun Girls Hair Saloon game is mainly developed for kids. This game allows users to select virtual avatars to ...
New

Sub Categories: