Keton

Keton

Hands-on Rust: How do I debug a call chain in Rust?

When running the program in chapter 8, “Implementing Combat”, the printout Health before attack was never printed so I assumed something was wrong in the call chain.

How would I go about debugging this call chain (ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap()...)?

#[system]
#[read_component(WantsToAttack)]
#[read_component(Health)]
pub fn combat(ecs: &mut SubWorld, commands: &mut CommandBuffer) {
    ...
    victims.iter().for_each(|(message, victim)| {
        if let Ok(mut health) = ecs
            .entry_mut(*victim)
            .unwrap()
            .get_component_mut::<Health>()
        {
            println!("Health before attack: {}", health.current);
            ...
        }
        commands.remove(*message);
    });
}

After some comparing of source code, I found out that I had actually written read_component(Health) instead of write_component(Health).

#[system]
#[read_component(WantsToAttack)]
#[write_component(Health)]
pub fn combat(ecs: &mut SubWorld, commands: &mut CommandBuffer) {
    ...
}

This is my first encounter with Rust but I was surprised that this error slipped by the compiler. I expected similar error as if I hade left out some mut

Most Liked

Red

Red

I don’t own this book so I cannot comment on the code, but here are a few tricks I use to debug chained methods and see the intermediate values. I’m using the IntelliJ plugin.

To just see the types at different point, the same techniques can be used - check values in a map, or split the chained method into several intermediate variables.

To take a dummy example:

    let values = vec!["one", "two", "three"];
    let values_str = values.iter()
        .enumerate()
        .map(|(i,s)| {
            format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s)      // <== breakpoint here
        })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");                         // <== breakpoint here
    println!("Result: {}", values_str);

It’s possible to place a breakpoint on the map closure. Make sure to use a block with ‘{ … }’ and that the code is not on the same line. Otherwise, values are not visible:

        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) }) // <== I cannot see anything

It’s also possible to put breakpoints on the lines after, but on the lines before it’s a bit tricky because it’s an iteration and there is no closure to expose any value. The debugger will stop but will not show anything. Sometimes you may be able to step into the function and catch something from there, but it’s tedious.

One way to look is to insert a dummy identity map. For example if I want to catch the values before the enumerate:

    let values_str = values.iter()
        .map(|x| {
            x                   // <== breakpoint here
        })
        .enumerate()
        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");

You can even put a println!(), that’s usually easier than looking at the values in the debugger.

Another way is to simply split the calls and store the intermediate result in temporary variables. Note the clone() to avoid losing ownership on the intermediate data:

    let values = vec!["one", "two", "three"];
    let values_str_1 = values.iter()
        .enumerate();
    let debug = values_str_1.clone().collect::<Vec<_>>();
    let values_str = values_str_1                         // <== breakpoint
        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");
    println!("Result: {}", values_str);

PS: I found out that with that plugin, you had disable the NatVis renderers if you examine the values in the LLDB view, otherwise you get a lot of warnings hindering the view:

herbert

herbert

Author of Hands-on Rust

Hi,

Thanks for reading the book!

Unfortunately, Legion (the ECS) is responsible for the World access (which is what the read_component is handling) - and doesn’t flag that one at compile time. I really wish it did!

The issue can be caught by changing the if let. if let is like a single-case match, so it’s only running the enclosed code if get_component_mut succeeds - and continues on its way if it fails.

get_component_mut returns a Result type. So you have a few options for handling this:

The simplest way, not very specific:

if let Ok(mut health) = ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>() {
} else {
     // Print an error here
}

Using match:

match ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>() {
    Ok(mut health) => { // do the health deduction }
    Err(msg) => { // Handle the error, msg will tell you what went wrong }
}

Or you can choose to crash when things go wrong (surprisingly helpful for debugging):

let mut victim = ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>().unwrap();
// Health deduction code

Hope that helps!

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

HarryDeveloper
Hi @venkats, It has been mentioned in the description of ‘Supervisory Job’ title that 2 things as mentioned below result in the same eff...
New
alanq
This isn’t directly about the book contents so maybe not the right forum…but in some of the code apps (e.g. turbo/06) it sends a TURBO_ST...
New
leba0495
Hello! Thanks for the great book. I was attempting the Trie (chap 17) exercises and for number 4 the solution provided for the autocorre...
New
brian-m-ops
#book-python-testing-with-pytest-second-edition Hi. Thanks for writing the book. I am just learning so this might just of been an issue ...
New
jskubick
I’m running Android Studio “Arctic Fox” 2020.3.1 Patch 2, and I’m embarrassed to admit that I only made it to page 8 before running into ...
New
brunogirin
When I run the coverage example to report on missing lines, I get: pytest --cov=cards --report=term-missing ch7 ERROR: usage: pytest [op...
New
brunogirin
When trying to run tox in parallel as explained on page 151, I got the following error: tox: error: argument -p/–parallel: expected one...
New
taguniversalmachine
Hi, I am getting an error I cannot figure out on my test. I have what I think is the exact code from the book, other than I changed “us...
New
andreheijstek
After running /bin/setup, the first error was: The foreman' command exists in these Ruby versions: That was easy to fix: gem install fore...
New
redconfetti
Docker-Machine became part of the Docker Toolbox, which was deprecated in 2020, long after Docker Desktop supported Docker Engine nativel...
New

Other popular topics Top

brentjanderson
Bought the Moonlander mechanical keyboard. Cherry Brown MX switches. Arms and wrists have been hurting enough that it’s time I did someth...
New
New
Exadra37
Oh just spent so much time on this to discover now that RancherOS is in end of life but Rancher is refusing to mark the Github repo as su...
New
rustkas
Intensively researching Erlang books and additional resources on it, I have found that the topic of using Regular Expressions is either c...
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Rails 7 completely redefines what it means to produce fantastic user experiences and provides a way to achieve all the benefits of single...
New
husaindevelop
Inside our android webview app, we are trying to paste the copied content from another app eg (notes) using navigator.clipboard.readtext ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Develop, deploy, and debug BEAM applications using BEAMOps: a new paradigm that focuses on scalability, fault tolerance, and owning each ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Get the comprehensive, insider information you need for Rails 8 with the new edition of this award-winning classic. Sam Ruby @rubys ...
New
AstonJ
Curious what kind of results others are getting, I think actually prefer the 7B model to the 32B model, not only is it faster but the qua...
New

Sub Categories: