Keton

Keton

Hands-on Rust: How do I debug a call chain in Rust?

When running the program in chapter 8, “Implementing Combat”, the printout Health before attack was never printed so I assumed something was wrong in the call chain.

How would I go about debugging this call chain (ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap()...)?

#[system]
#[read_component(WantsToAttack)]
#[read_component(Health)]
pub fn combat(ecs: &mut SubWorld, commands: &mut CommandBuffer) {
    ...
    victims.iter().for_each(|(message, victim)| {
        if let Ok(mut health) = ecs
            .entry_mut(*victim)
            .unwrap()
            .get_component_mut::<Health>()
        {
            println!("Health before attack: {}", health.current);
            ...
        }
        commands.remove(*message);
    });
}

After some comparing of source code, I found out that I had actually written read_component(Health) instead of write_component(Health).

#[system]
#[read_component(WantsToAttack)]
#[write_component(Health)]
pub fn combat(ecs: &mut SubWorld, commands: &mut CommandBuffer) {
    ...
}

This is my first encounter with Rust but I was surprised that this error slipped by the compiler. I expected similar error as if I hade left out some mut

Most Liked

Red

Red

I don’t own this book so I cannot comment on the code, but here are a few tricks I use to debug chained methods and see the intermediate values. I’m using the IntelliJ plugin.

To just see the types at different point, the same techniques can be used - check values in a map, or split the chained method into several intermediate variables.

To take a dummy example:

    let values = vec!["one", "two", "three"];
    let values_str = values.iter()
        .enumerate()
        .map(|(i,s)| {
            format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s)      // <== breakpoint here
        })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");                         // <== breakpoint here
    println!("Result: {}", values_str);

It’s possible to place a breakpoint on the map closure. Make sure to use a block with ‘{ … }’ and that the code is not on the same line. Otherwise, values are not visible:

        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) }) // <== I cannot see anything

It’s also possible to put breakpoints on the lines after, but on the lines before it’s a bit tricky because it’s an iteration and there is no closure to expose any value. The debugger will stop but will not show anything. Sometimes you may be able to step into the function and catch something from there, but it’s tedious.

One way to look is to insert a dummy identity map. For example if I want to catch the values before the enumerate:

    let values_str = values.iter()
        .map(|x| {
            x                   // <== breakpoint here
        })
        .enumerate()
        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");

You can even put a println!(), that’s usually easier than looking at the values in the debugger.

Another way is to simply split the calls and store the intermediate result in temporary variables. Note the clone() to avoid losing ownership on the intermediate data:

    let values = vec!["one", "two", "three"];
    let values_str_1 = values.iter()
        .enumerate();
    let debug = values_str_1.clone().collect::<Vec<_>>();
    let values_str = values_str_1                         // <== breakpoint
        .map(|(i,s)| { format!("{}: {}", i + 1, s) })
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join(", ");
    println!("Result: {}", values_str);

PS: I found out that with that plugin, you had disable the NatVis renderers if you examine the values in the LLDB view, otherwise you get a lot of warnings hindering the view:

herbert

herbert

Author of Hands-on Rust

Hi,

Thanks for reading the book!

Unfortunately, Legion (the ECS) is responsible for the World access (which is what the read_component is handling) - and doesn’t flag that one at compile time. I really wish it did!

The issue can be caught by changing the if let. if let is like a single-case match, so it’s only running the enclosed code if get_component_mut succeeds - and continues on its way if it fails.

get_component_mut returns a Result type. So you have a few options for handling this:

The simplest way, not very specific:

if let Ok(mut health) = ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>() {
} else {
     // Print an error here
}

Using match:

match ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>() {
    Ok(mut health) => { // do the health deduction }
    Err(msg) => { // Handle the error, msg will tell you what went wrong }
}

Or you can choose to crash when things go wrong (surprisingly helpful for debugging):

let mut victim = ecs.entry_mut(*victim).unwrap().get_component_mut::<Health>().unwrap();
// Health deduction code

Hope that helps!

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

brianokken
Many tasks_proj/tests directories exist in chapters 2, 3, 5 that have tests that use the custom markers smoke and get, which are not decl...
New
GilWright
Working through the steps (checking that the Info,plist matches exactly), run the demo game and what appears is grey but does not fill th...
New
Mmm
Hi, build fails on: bracket-lib = “~0.8.1” when running on Mac Mini M1 Rust version 1.5.0: Compiling winit v0.22.2 error[E0308]: mi...
New
raul
Page 28: It implements io.ReaderAt on the store type. Sorry if it’s a dumb question but was the io.ReaderAt supposed to be io.ReadAt? ...
New
AleksandrKudashkin
On the page xv there is an instruction to run bin/setup from the main folder. I downloaded the source code today (12/03/21) and can’t see...
New
jeremyhuiskamp
Title: Web Development with Clojure, Third Edition, vB17.0 (p9) The create table guestbook syntax suggested doesn’t seem to be accepted ...
New
Chrichton
Dear Sophie. I tried to do the “Authorization” exercise and have two questions: When trying to plug in an email-service, I found the ...
New
jskubick
I’m running Android Studio “Arctic Fox” 2020.3.1 Patch 2, and I’m embarrassed to admit that I only made it to page 8 before running into ...
New
fynn
This is as much a suggestion as a question, as a note for others. Locally the SGP30 wasn’t available, so I ordered a SGP40. On page 53, ...
New
redconfetti
Docker-Machine became part of the Docker Toolbox, which was deprecated in 2020, long after Docker Desktop supported Docker Engine nativel...
New

Other popular topics Top

New
PragmaticBookshelf
Learn from the award-winning programming series that inspired the Elixir language, and go on a step-by-step journey through the most impo...
New
wolf4earth
@AstonJ prompted me to open this topic after I mentioned in the lockdown thread how I started to do a lot more for my fitness. https://f...
New
Exadra37
I am thinking in building or buy a desktop computer for programing, both professionally and on my free time, and my choice of OS is Linux...
New
Exadra37
Please tell us what is your preferred monitor setup for programming(not gaming) and why you have chosen it. Does your monitor have eye p...
New
AstonJ
We have a thread about the keyboards we have, but what about nice keyboards we come across that we want? If you have seen any that look n...
New
AstonJ
Was just curious to see if any were around, found this one: I got 51/100: Not sure if it was meant to buy I am sure at times the b...
New
New
sir.laksmana_wenk
I’m able to do the “artistic” part of game-development; character designing/modeling, music, environment modeling, etc. However, I don’t...
New
Margaret
Ask Me Anything with Mark Volkmann @mvolkmann On February 24 and 25, we are giving you a chance to ask questions of PragProg author M...
New

Sub Categories: