tvanderpol

tvanderpol

Genetic Algorithms in Elixir: First stab at Ch1 algorithm converges just fine? (p28)

I’ve got something of the opposite of the usual problem - my code doesn’t fail in the way the text suggests it should (when it suggests premature convergence is the cause).

I’ve ran the code a fair bit and did some debug print injecting and such but I can’t really see anything out of the ordinary - it converges on the correct answer almost instantly if I run it without any additional debug and it takes a reasonable amount of generations from what I can tell by poking at it.

Now I am clear to continue the chapter as-is, and I understand the argument being made, but I don’t understand how the algorithm is meant to fail (I do in the abstract but I mean the code as written) and that’s bugging me.

Marked As Solved

seanmor5

seanmor5

Author of Genetic Algorithms in Elixir

There was a mistake in my version of the code that forced early convergence with smaller populations that isn’t present in the book’s transcription of the code.

To better demonstrate premature convergence: set chromosome size to 1000 and population size to 100. You’ll notice your version without mutation converges much slower than with mutation. You can continue to decrease the population size further and further and you’ll reach a point where progress completely stops.

Sorry about the confusion!

Also Liked

christhekeele

christhekeele

This was on quite a new Macbook, which may be influencing results from what’s expected.

MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2019)
2.4 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i9
32 GB 2667 MHz DDR4
Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.7.2] [64-bit] [smp:16:16]
Elixir 1.10.3

tvanderpol

tvanderpol

Perfect, thank you for responding so fast! That helps my understanding of exactly how it fails a lot.

christhekeele

christhekeele

I noticed this in the B1 edition as well!

Re:

$ elixir one_max.exs
Current Best: 32

But wait, what’s going on here? Why is the algorithm stopping on a best fitness below 42? No matter how many times you run it, the algorithm will almost always certainly stop improving below 42. The problem is premature convergence.

At this point, the chapter’s example code looks like:

Code to Date
population = for _ <- 1..10, do: for _ <- 1..42, do: Enum.random(0..1)

evaluate = fn population ->
  Enum.sort_by(population, &Enum.sum(&1), &>=/2)
end

selection = fn population ->
  population
  |> Enum.chunk_every(2)
  |> Enum.map(&List.to_tuple(&1))
end

crossover = fn population ->
  Enum.reduce(population, [], fn {p1, p2}, acc ->
    cx_point = :rand.uniform(42)
    {{h1, t1}, {h2, t2}} = {Enum.split(p1, cx_point), Enum.split(p2, cx_point)}
    [h1 ++ t2 | [h2 ++ t1 | acc]]
  end)
end

algorithm = fn population, algorithm ->
  best = Enum.max_by(population, &Enum.sum(&1))
  IO.write("\rCurrent Best: " <> Integer.to_string(Enum.sum(best)))
  if Enum.sum(best) == 42 do
    best
  else
    population
    |> evaluate.()
    |> selection.()
    |> crossover.()
    |> algorithm.(algorithm)
  end
end

solution = algorithm.(population, algorithm)
IO.write("\n Answer is \n")
IO.inspect solution

I parameterized it thusly:

Tunable version
-population = for _ <- 1..10, do: for _ <- 1..42, do: Enum.random(0..1)
+problem_size = 42
+population_size = 100
+
+population = for _ <- 1..population_size, do: for _ <- 1..problem_size, do: Enum.random(0..1)

 evaluate = fn population ->
   Enum.sort_by(population, &Enum.sum(&1), &>=/2)
 end

 selection = fn population ->
   population
   |> Enum.chunk_every(2)
   |> Enum.map(&List.to_tuple(&1))
 end

 crossover = fn population ->
   Enum.reduce(population, [], fn {p1, p2}, acc ->
-    cx_point = :rand.uniform(42)
+    cx_point = :rand.uniform(problem_size)
     {{h1, t1}, {h2, t2}} = {Enum.split(p1, cx_point), Enum.split(p2, cx_point)}
     [h1 ++ t2 | [h2 ++ t1 | acc]]
   end)
 end

 algorithm = fn population, algorithm ->
   best = Enum.max_by(population, &Enum.sum(&1))
   IO.write("\rCurrent Best: " <> Integer.to_string(Enum.sum(best)))
-  if Enum.sum(best) == 42 do
+  if Enum.sum(best) == problem_size do
     best
   else
     population
     |> evaluate.()
     |> selection.()
     |> crossover.()
     |> algorithm.(algorithm)
   end
 end

 solution = algorithm.(population, algorithm)
 IO.write("\n Answer is \n")
 IO.inspect solution

In my experimentation, with problem_size = 42, not only did population_size = 100 always converge on the best answer, but even as low as population_size = 8 consistently converged. I started seeing the need for mutation around population_size = 6, which normally gets stuck around 35.

Alternatively, increasing the size of the problem to problem_size = 420 usually converged correctly, but with enough time to watch things work. problem_size = 4200 consistently gets stuck around 2400, as the narrative of the chapter wants it to.

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

jimschubert
In Chapter 3, the source for index introduces Config on page 31, followed by more code including tests; Config isn’t introduced until pag...
New
AleksandrKudashkin
On the page xv there is an instruction to run bin/setup from the main folder. I downloaded the source code today (12/03/21) and can’t see...
New
gilesdotcodes
In case this helps anyone, I’ve had issues setting up the rails source code. Here were the solutions: In Gemfile, change gem 'rails' t...
New
New
leba0495
Hello! Thanks for the great book. I was attempting the Trie (chap 17) exercises and for number 4 the solution provided for the autocorre...
New
adamwoolhether
When trying to generate the protobuf .go file, I receive this error: Unknown flag: --go_opt libprotoc 3.12.3 MacOS 11.3.1 Googling ...
New
brunogirin
When installing Cards as an editable package, I get the following error: ERROR: File “setup.py” not found. Directory cannot be installe...
New
taguniversalmachine
It seems the second code snippet is missing the code to set the current_user: current_user: Accounts.get_user_by_session_token(session["...
New
rainforest
Hi, I’ve got a question about the implementation of PubSub when using a Phoenix.Socket.Transport behaviour rather than channels. Before ...
New
dtonhofer
@parrt In the context of Chapter 4.3, the grammar Java.g4, meant to parse Java 6 compilation units, no longer passes ANTLR (currently 4....
New

Other popular topics Top

ohm
Which, if any, games do you play? On what platform? I just bought (and completed) Minecraft Dungeons for my Nintendo Switch. Other than ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Design and develop sophisticated 2D games that are as much fun to make as they are to play. From particle effects and pathfinding to soci...
New
AstonJ
I’ve been hearing quite a lot of comments relating to the sound of a keyboard, with one of the most desirable of these called ‘thock’, he...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Rust is an exciting new programming language combining the power of C with memory safety, fearless concurrency, and productivity boosters...
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
New
Help
I am trying to crate a game for the Nintendo switch, I wanted to use Java as I am comfortable with that programming language. Can you use...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Programming Ruby is the most complete book on Ruby, covering both the language itself and the standard library as well as commonly used t...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Develop, deploy, and debug BEAM applications using BEAMOps: a new paradigm that focuses on scalability, fault tolerance, and owning each ...
New
AnfaengerAlex
Hello, I’m a beginner in Android development and I’m facing an issue with my project setup. In my build.gradle.kts file, I have the foll...
New

Sub Categories: