harwind

harwind

Java's for each loop

So, basically, I’m writing a method to check application numbers in my array ‘applications,’ and this method receives a parameter to verify that specific application number and compares it to the application numbers in the list.
So first look at the code:

public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
    if (number <= 3 ) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");   
    }

    for (ApplicationData current : applications) {
        if (number == current.getApplicationNumber() ) {    
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}  

JUnit test to validate the application number:

public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
    University westGeorgia = new University("West Georgia");
    ApplicationData student1 = new ApplicationData(9, 7.0, 400);
    westGeorgia.addApplication(student1);
    assertEquals(true, westGeorgia.hasApplicationNumber(1));
}

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

However, if I change the return values in my “hasApplicationNumber” method to true (at the very bottom of the method), this test will pass, but another test I have (that doesn’t allow the list to exceed 10) will return “true” when it is supposed to be “false,” causing that test to fail (I didn’t include that test because it is very similar to the one I have already provided — just “1” is changed to “10” and “true”
I’m beginning to suspect that either my test is being ignored by the Java compiler, or my for-each loop is executing correctly and returning “true,” but since I followed this documentation, I have that lingering false at the very end, which may be declaring the item false nonetheless.

I might be overthinking this, but I’m at a loss on how to change the for-each loop in the method I wrote. Any assistance in sorting this out would be much appreciated!

Most Liked

dtonhofer

dtonhofer

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

Isn’t the JUnit test failing because the

hasApplicationNumber(1)

throws?

At this point, the easiest way to unconfuse yourself is to add a few print statements into the test code.

System.out.println("After test for throw );

etc.

finner

finner

hi @harwind -
According to the code you have pasted when you pass 1 into the method hasApplicationNumber an IllegalArgumentException will be thrown. So the test should fail.
I’ve also noticed that you are using double in the ApplicationData class but treating them as int in the hasApplicationNumber method.
Here is a stripped down version without the ApplicationData class and using int.

public class DevTalkTest {

    private final int[] numbers = new int[]{9, 7, 400};

    @Test
    public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
        assertTrue(hasApplicationNumber(1));
    }


    public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
        if (number <= 3) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");
        }
        for (int num : numbers) {
            if (num == number) return true;
        }
        return false;
    }


}

The tests will fail with the error:

bad number
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bad number
. . . 
finner

finner

I was going to suggest setting a breakpoint on the last line.

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics Top

Devtalk
Reading something? Working on something? Planning something? Changing jobs even!? If you’re up for sharing, please let us know what you’...
1050 21151 394
New
Rainer
Have you seen the new features that will be available in the upcoming C# 9 release? C# is taking a lot of input from functional l...
New
AstonJ
If you’re a fan, why? If you’re not fussed on it, how comes?
New
chasekaylee
Just like the title says :smiley: which courses you find that have had the most impact in the span of your career as a developer?
New
AstonJ
Inspired by this post from @Carter, which languages, frameworks or other tech or tools do you think is killing it right now? :upside_down...
New
chaptuck
I am thinking about getting a fitness tracker of some kind (probably one from Garmin). Have any of you developed your own widgets, watchf...
New
jaeyson
Hi all, does anybody tried Shankar Devy’s Phoenix Inside Out book series? Also, will there be a big difference (aside from context prior...
New
OvermindDL1
Maybe we need a thread of hosting providers we like and for what reasons. I personally like OVH, they are a very low level host (they re...
New
DevotionGeo
Hi everyone! I bought this domain name when I was planning to create a website like ElixirSchool.com, but that didn’t ever happen. Now ...
New
AntonRich
I don’t know what happened today. But I just started reading SICP which I meant to do for a long time. The book itself: I’m not even s...
New

Other popular topics Top

brentjanderson
Bought the Moonlander mechanical keyboard. Cherry Brown MX switches. Arms and wrists have been hurting enough that it’s time I did someth...
New
Rainer
My first contact with Erlang was about 2 years ago when I used RabbitMQ, which is written in Erlang, for my job. This made me curious and...
New
DevotionGeo
The V Programming Language Simple language for building maintainable programs V is already mentioned couple of times in the forum, but I...
New
rustkas
Intensively researching Erlang books and additional resources on it, I have found that the topic of using Regular Expressions is either c...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Rebecca Skinner @RebeccaSkinner Welcome to our latest author spotlight, where we sit down with Rebecca Skinner, auth...
New
New
DevotionGeo
I have always used antique keyboards like Cherry MX 1800 or Cherry MX 8100 and almost always have modified the switches in some way, like...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Develop, deploy, and debug BEAM applications using BEAMOps: a new paradigm that focuses on scalability, fault tolerance, and owning each ...
New
AstonJ
This is cool! DEEPSEEK-V3 ON M4 MAC: BLAZING FAST INFERENCE ON APPLE SILICON We just witnessed something incredible: the largest open-s...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Fight complexity and reclaim the original spirit of agility by learning to simplify how you develop software. The result: a more humane a...
New