harwind

harwind

Java's for each loop

So, basically, I’m writing a method to check application numbers in my array ‘applications,’ and this method receives a parameter to verify that specific application number and compares it to the application numbers in the list.
So first look at the code:

public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
    if (number <= 3 ) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");   
    }

    for (ApplicationData current : applications) {
        if (number == current.getApplicationNumber() ) {    
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}  

JUnit test to validate the application number:

public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
    University westGeorgia = new University("West Georgia");
    ApplicationData student1 = new ApplicationData(9, 7.0, 400);
    westGeorgia.addApplication(student1);
    assertEquals(true, westGeorgia.hasApplicationNumber(1));
}

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

However, if I change the return values in my “hasApplicationNumber” method to true (at the very bottom of the method), this test will pass, but another test I have (that doesn’t allow the list to exceed 10) will return “true” when it is supposed to be “false,” causing that test to fail (I didn’t include that test because it is very similar to the one I have already provided — just “1” is changed to “10” and “true”
I’m beginning to suspect that either my test is being ignored by the Java compiler, or my for-each loop is executing correctly and returning “true,” but since I followed this documentation, I have that lingering false at the very end, which may be declaring the item false nonetheless.

I might be overthinking this, but I’m at a loss on how to change the for-each loop in the method I wrote. Any assistance in sorting this out would be much appreciated!

Most Liked

dtonhofer

dtonhofer

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

Isn’t the JUnit test failing because the

hasApplicationNumber(1)

throws?

At this point, the easiest way to unconfuse yourself is to add a few print statements into the test code.

System.out.println("After test for throw );

etc.

finner

finner

hi @harwind -
According to the code you have pasted when you pass 1 into the method hasApplicationNumber an IllegalArgumentException will be thrown. So the test should fail.
I’ve also noticed that you are using double in the ApplicationData class but treating them as int in the hasApplicationNumber method.
Here is a stripped down version without the ApplicationData class and using int.

public class DevTalkTest {

    private final int[] numbers = new int[]{9, 7, 400};

    @Test
    public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
        assertTrue(hasApplicationNumber(1));
    }


    public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
        if (number <= 3) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");
        }
        for (int num : numbers) {
            if (num == number) return true;
        }
        return false;
    }


}

The tests will fail with the error:

bad number
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bad number
. . . 
finner

finner

I was going to suggest setting a breakpoint on the last line.

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics Top

AstonJ
Curious to know which languages and frameworks you’re all thinking about learning next :upside_down_face: Perhaps if there’s enough peop...
New
AstonJ
It’s great to see how popular some of these channels have become - do you have any favourite YouTuber devs? Ben Awad Code...
New
dwaynebradley
In their weekly newsletter, Jared Santo from the Changelog shared this blog post by Mark Ericksen over at fly.io: What is really inter...
New
Exadra37
Kubernetes is everywhere. Transactional apps, video streaming services and machine learning workloads are finding a home on this ever-gro...
New
foxtrottwist
A few weeks ago I started using Warp a terminal written in rust. Though in it’s current state of development there are a few caveats (tab...
New
jaeyson
Not trying to add more mess here but, reddit has ELI5 but i wanted to know if it’s okay to ask Elixir-specific (or outside of it) in a si...
New
chaptuck
I am thinking about getting a fitness tracker of some kind (probably one from Garmin). Have any of you developed your own widgets, watchf...
New
jaeyson
Hi all, does anybody tried Shankar Devy’s Phoenix Inside Out book series? Also, will there be a big difference (aside from context prior...
New
OvermindDL1
Maybe we need a thread of hosting providers we like and for what reasons. I personally like OVH, they are a very low level host (they re...
New
jaeyson
Hi!, hope everyone’s ok. Sorry if this question is ambiguous (i’ll remove this if i break some rules here). This is more like a self-ques...
New

Other popular topics Top

PragmaticBookshelf
Learn from the award-winning programming series that inspired the Elixir language, and go on a step-by-step journey through the most impo...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Ruby, Io, Prolog, Scala, Erlang, Clojure, Haskell. With Seven Languages in Seven Weeks, by Bruce A. Tate, you’ll go beyond the syntax—and...
New
wolf4earth
@AstonJ prompted me to open this topic after I mentioned in the lockdown thread how I started to do a lot more for my fitness. https://f...
New
AstonJ
There’s a whole world of custom keycaps out there that I didn’t know existed! Check out all of our Keycaps threads here: https://forum....
New
AstonJ
In case anyone else is wondering why Ruby 3 doesn’t show when you do asdf list-all ruby :man_facepalming: do this first: asdf plugin-upd...
New
AstonJ
We’ve talked about his book briefly here but it is quickly becoming obsolete - so he’s decided to create a series of 7 podcasts, the firs...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Jamis Buck @jamis This month, we have the pleasure of spotlighting author Jamis Buck, who has written Mazes for Prog...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Mike Riley @mriley This month, we turn the spotlight on Mike Riley, author of Portable Python Projects. Mike’s book ...
New
AstonJ
Curious what kind of results others are getting, I think actually prefer the 7B model to the 32B model, not only is it faster but the qua...
New