harwind

harwind

Java's for each loop

So, basically, I’m writing a method to check application numbers in my array ‘applications,’ and this method receives a parameter to verify that specific application number and compares it to the application numbers in the list.
So first look at the code:

public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
    if (number <= 3 ) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");   
    }

    for (ApplicationData current : applications) {
        if (number == current.getApplicationNumber() ) {    
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}  

JUnit test to validate the application number:

public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
    University westGeorgia = new University("West Georgia");
    ApplicationData student1 = new ApplicationData(9, 7.0, 400);
    westGeorgia.addApplication(student1);
    assertEquals(true, westGeorgia.hasApplicationNumber(1));
}

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

However, if I change the return values in my “hasApplicationNumber” method to true (at the very bottom of the method), this test will pass, but another test I have (that doesn’t allow the list to exceed 10) will return “true” when it is supposed to be “false,” causing that test to fail (I didn’t include that test because it is very similar to the one I have already provided — just “1” is changed to “10” and “true”
I’m beginning to suspect that either my test is being ignored by the Java compiler, or my for-each loop is executing correctly and returning “true,” but since I followed this documentation, I have that lingering false at the very end, which may be declaring the item false nonetheless.

I might be overthinking this, but I’m at a loss on how to change the for-each loop in the method I wrote. Any assistance in sorting this out would be much appreciated!

Most Liked

dtonhofer

dtonhofer

This JUnit test is failing because my code returns “false” instead of “true.”

Isn’t the JUnit test failing because the

hasApplicationNumber(1)

throws?

At this point, the easiest way to unconfuse yourself is to add a few print statements into the test code.

System.out.println("After test for throw );

etc.

finner

finner

hi @harwind -
According to the code you have pasted when you pass 1 into the method hasApplicationNumber an IllegalArgumentException will be thrown. So the test should fail.
I’ve also noticed that you are using double in the ApplicationData class but treating them as int in the hasApplicationNumber method.
Here is a stripped down version without the ApplicationData class and using int.

public class DevTalkTest {

    private final int[] numbers = new int[]{9, 7, 400};

    @Test
    public void shouldHaveApplicationNumber1() {
        assertTrue(hasApplicationNumber(1));
    }


    public boolean hasApplicationNumber(int number) {
        if (number <= 3) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("bad number");
        }
        for (int num : numbers) {
            if (num == number) return true;
        }
        return false;
    }


}

The tests will fail with the error:

bad number
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bad number
. . . 
finner

finner

I was going to suggest setting a breakpoint on the last line.

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics Top

wolf4earth
Inspired by this thread about arcade games - which I initially misread as favorite arcade game soundtracks - I wanted to ask about your f...
New
axelson
Can anyone recommend a tmux session switcher? I’ve used https://github.com/siadat/session-finder in the past but it’s not very actively m...
New
siddhant3030
I’m thinking of buying a monitor that I can rotate to use as a vertical monitor? Also, I want to know if someone is using it for program...
New
AstonJ
Thought it might be worth having a dedicated thread for standing desk treadmills (for those interested, here’s our general thread on stan...
New
Rainer
Not sure if following fits exactly this thread, or if we should have a hobby thread… For many years I’m designing and building model air...
New
Margaret
Hello everyone! This thread is to tell you about what authors from The Pragmatic Bookshelf are writing on Medium.
1147 29994 760
New
Exadra37
Kubernetes is everywhere. Transactional apps, video streaming services and machine learning workloads are finding a home on this ever-gro...
New
jaeyson
Not trying to add more mess here but, reddit has ELI5 but i wanted to know if it’s okay to ask Elixir-specific (or outside of it) in a si...
New
AstonJ
Chris Seaton, the creator of TruffleRuby has died. It appears from suicide :cry: He left this note on Twitter on the weekend: And one...
New
DevotionGeo
I am planning to refresh my Ruby knowledge in a month or two, after using other technologies more frequently for a few years. Luckily I w...
New

Other popular topics Top

AstonJ
A thread that every forum needs! Simply post a link to a track on YouTube (or SoundCloud or Vimeo amongst others!) on a separate line an...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Write Elixir tests that you can be proud of. Dive into Elixir’s test philosophy and gain mastery over the terminology and concepts that u...
New
Exadra37
I am thinking in building or buy a desktop computer for programing, both professionally and on my free time, and my choice of OS is Linux...
New
siddhant3030
I’m thinking of buying a monitor that I can rotate to use as a vertical monitor? Also, I want to know if someone is using it for program...
New
AstonJ
There’s a whole world of custom keycaps out there that I didn’t know existed! Check out all of our Keycaps threads here: https://forum....
New
Exadra37
I am asking for any distro that only has the bare-bones to be able to get a shell in the server and then just install the packages as we ...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Programming Ruby is the most complete book on Ruby, covering both the language itself and the standard library as well as commonly used t...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight: Peter Ullrich @PJUllrich Data is at the core of every business, but it is useless if nobody can access and analyze ...
New
AstonJ
Curious what kind of results others are getting, I think actually prefer the 7B model to the 32B model, not only is it faster but the qua...
New