dtonhofer

dtonhofer

Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition: All the code for Chapter 8, "Using Tail-Call Optimization", in one class

All the code for Chapter 8, Using Tail-Call Optimization, in one class. But without the part where we later need to “fix the arithmetic overflow”, an ancillary problem that is solely due to the fact that the example recursive function we use is the factorial. Here we use a simple recursive sum instead.

package chapter8.tailcalls;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

public class Chapter8_TailCallOptimization {

    private final static int limit = 70000;

    // ---
    // The "very slick stack simulator" (VSSS) for optimizable (not necessarily recursive) tail calls
    // This is the code "recur/fpij/TailCall.java" on p.142
    // with a fix: the .get() on the Stream has been replaced by .orElseThrow()
    // If we only use get(), the linter tells us: "Optional.get() without "isPresent()" check".
    // ---

    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface TailCall<T> {

        TailCall<T> apply();

        default boolean isComplete() {
            return false;
        }

        default T result() {
            throw new Error("not implemented");
        }

        default T invoke() {
            return Stream.iterate(this, TailCall::apply)
                    .filter(TailCall::isComplete)
                    .findFirst()
                    .orElseThrow()
                    .result();
        }
    }

    // "recur/fpij/TailCalls.java" on p.143

    public static class TailCalls {

        // call() simply exists so that usage has a symmetric look
        // (...but I'm not sure this improves understanding)

        public static <T> TailCall<T> call(final TailCall<T> nextCall) {
            return nextCall;
        }

        public static <T> TailCall<T> done(final T value) {
            return new TailCall<T>() {
                @Override
                public boolean isComplete() {
                    return true;
                }

                @Override
                public T result() {
                    return value;
                }

                @Override
                public TailCall<T> apply() {
                    throw new Error("not implemented");
                }
            };
        }
    }

    // ---
    // Summing using a recursive call that is not a tail call (avoid if possible, though
    // it is not always possible)
    // Replaces "recur/fpij/Factorial.java" on page 140.
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyNaively {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return (number == 1) ? 1 : (number + sum(number - 1));
        }
    }

    // ---
    // Summing using a recursive call that is a proper tail call.
    // This approach uses an accumulator while going "down/into" the recursion.
    // On the way "back up/outo of" the recursion there are only "returns".
    // This can be optimized so that only 1 stack frame is used. However, the Java compiler
    // (and/or the JVM?) does not do that fully (maybe because it needs to keep track of
    // stack frames for debugging?), so we still get stack overflow after some time.
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return sum_inner(1, number);
        }



        private static long sum_inner(final long accumulator, final int number) {
            if (number == 1) {
                return accumulator;
            } else {
                return sum_inner(accumulator + number, number - 1);
            }
        }
    }

    // ---
    // An application of VSSS - the very sly stack simulator
    // Replaces "recur/fpij/Factorial.java" on p.141
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyWithVSSS {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return sum_inner(1, number).invoke();
        }

        // Note that this method is *never* called recursively!

        public static TailCall<Long> sum_inner(final long accumulator, final int number) {
            if (number == 1) {
                // Return the "TailCalls" instance that ends the stream
                return TailCalls.done(accumulator);
            } else {
                // "call()" does nothing, and we could just return the closure directly, but it looks nice
                return TailCalls.call(
                        // When called by Stream.iterate(), this closure is supposed to generate&return the
                        // "next TailCall instance" of the stream
                        () -> sum_inner(accumulator + number, number - 1)
                );
            }
        }
    }

    // === TESTING SUPPORT BEGINS ===

    private static boolean callSum(final boolean skip, final String name, int n, Function<Integer, Long> sum) {
        boolean skipNextTime = skip;
        if (!skip) {
            try {
                long res = sum.apply(n);
                // Properly, this test should be in the caller
                if (n == limit - 1) {
                    System.out.println("Reached the end: " + name + "(" + n + ") = " + res);
                }
            } catch (StackOverflowError err) {
                System.out.println("Stack overflow for " + name + "(" + n + ")");
                skipNextTime = true;
            }
        }
        return skipNextTime;
    }

    // Running the three approaches at summing recursively till stack overflow occurs!
    // Works best if one reduces the maximum stack size of the JVM,
    // options "-Xss1m" or "-XX:ThreadStackSize=1024" (the latter in KiB)
    // See https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/specs/man/java.html#advanced-runtime-options-for-java
    //
    // Example output:
    //
    // Stack overflow for SumRecursivelyNaively.sum(38919)
    // Stack overflow for SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls.sum(58375)
    // Reached the end: SumRecursivelyWithVSSS.sum(69999) = 2449965000

    @Test
    public void runThem() {
        boolean skipNaiveVersion = false;
        boolean skipTailCallVersion = false;
        boolean skipVsssVersion = false;
        for (int n = 1; n < limit && !(skipTailCallVersion && skipNaiveVersion && skipVsssVersion); n += 1) {
            skipNaiveVersion = callSum(skipNaiveVersion, "SumRecursivelyNaively.sum", n, SumRecursivelyNaively::sum);
            skipTailCallVersion = callSum(skipTailCallVersion, "SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls.sum", n, SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls::sum);
            skipVsssVersion = callSum(skipVsssVersion, "SumRecursivelyWithVSSS.sum", n, SumRecursivelyWithVSSS::sum);
        }
    }

}

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

abtin
page 20: … protoc command… I had to additionally run the following go get commands in order to be able to compile protobuf code using go...
New
Mmm
Hi, build fails on: bracket-lib = “~0.8.1” when running on Mac Mini M1 Rust version 1.5.0: Compiling winit v0.22.2 error[E0308]: mi...
New
HarryDeveloper
Hi @venkats, It has been mentioned in the description of ‘Supervisory Job’ title that 2 things as mentioned below result in the same eff...
New
leba0495
Hello! Thanks for the great book. I was attempting the Trie (chap 17) exercises and for number 4 the solution provided for the autocorre...
New
adamwoolhether
When trying to generate the protobuf .go file, I receive this error: Unknown flag: --go_opt libprotoc 3.12.3 MacOS 11.3.1 Googling ...
New
jskubick
I’m running Android Studio “Arctic Fox” 2020.3.1 Patch 2, and I’m embarrassed to admit that I only made it to page 8 before running into ...
New
dsmith42
Hey there, I’m enjoying this book and have learned a few things alredayd. However, in Chapter 4 I believe we are meant to see the “&gt;...
New
taguniversalmachine
Hi, I am getting an error I cannot figure out on my test. I have what I think is the exact code from the book, other than I changed “us...
New
ggerico
I got this error when executing the plot files on macOS Ventura 13.0.1 with Python 3.10.8 and matplotlib 3.6.1: programming_ML/code/03_...
New
dachristenson
I’ve got to the end of Ch. 11, and the app runs, with all tabs displaying what they should – at first. After switching around between St...
New

Other popular topics Top

New
wolf4earth
@AstonJ prompted me to open this topic after I mentioned in the lockdown thread how I started to do a lot more for my fitness. https://f...
New
New
AstonJ
You might be thinking we should just ask who’s not using VSCode :joy: however there are some new additions in the space that might give V...
New
AstonJ
Thanks to @foxtrottwist’s and @Tomas’s posts in this thread: Poll: Which code editor do you use? I bought Onivim! :nerd_face: https://on...
New
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Rails 7 completely redefines what it means to produce fantastic user experiences and provides a way to achieve all the benefits of single...
New
AstonJ
If you want a quick and easy way to block any website on your Mac using Little Snitch simply… File &gt; New Rule: And select Deny, O...
New
AstonJ
Curious what kind of results others are getting, I think actually prefer the 7B model to the 32B model, not only is it faster but the qua...
New

Latest in Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition

Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition Portal

Sub Categories: