dtonhofer

dtonhofer

Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition: All the code for Chapter 8, "Using Tail-Call Optimization", in one class

All the code for Chapter 8, Using Tail-Call Optimization, in one class. But without the part where we later need to “fix the arithmetic overflow”, an ancillary problem that is solely due to the fact that the example recursive function we use is the factorial. Here we use a simple recursive sum instead.

package chapter8.tailcalls;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import java.util.function.Function;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

public class Chapter8_TailCallOptimization {

    private final static int limit = 70000;

    // ---
    // The "very slick stack simulator" (VSSS) for optimizable (not necessarily recursive) tail calls
    // This is the code "recur/fpij/TailCall.java" on p.142
    // with a fix: the .get() on the Stream has been replaced by .orElseThrow()
    // If we only use get(), the linter tells us: "Optional.get() without "isPresent()" check".
    // ---

    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface TailCall<T> {

        TailCall<T> apply();

        default boolean isComplete() {
            return false;
        }

        default T result() {
            throw new Error("not implemented");
        }

        default T invoke() {
            return Stream.iterate(this, TailCall::apply)
                    .filter(TailCall::isComplete)
                    .findFirst()
                    .orElseThrow()
                    .result();
        }
    }

    // "recur/fpij/TailCalls.java" on p.143

    public static class TailCalls {

        // call() simply exists so that usage has a symmetric look
        // (...but I'm not sure this improves understanding)

        public static <T> TailCall<T> call(final TailCall<T> nextCall) {
            return nextCall;
        }

        public static <T> TailCall<T> done(final T value) {
            return new TailCall<T>() {
                @Override
                public boolean isComplete() {
                    return true;
                }

                @Override
                public T result() {
                    return value;
                }

                @Override
                public TailCall<T> apply() {
                    throw new Error("not implemented");
                }
            };
        }
    }

    // ---
    // Summing using a recursive call that is not a tail call (avoid if possible, though
    // it is not always possible)
    // Replaces "recur/fpij/Factorial.java" on page 140.
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyNaively {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return (number == 1) ? 1 : (number + sum(number - 1));
        }
    }

    // ---
    // Summing using a recursive call that is a proper tail call.
    // This approach uses an accumulator while going "down/into" the recursion.
    // On the way "back up/outo of" the recursion there are only "returns".
    // This can be optimized so that only 1 stack frame is used. However, the Java compiler
    // (and/or the JVM?) does not do that fully (maybe because it needs to keep track of
    // stack frames for debugging?), so we still get stack overflow after some time.
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return sum_inner(1, number);
        }



        private static long sum_inner(final long accumulator, final int number) {
            if (number == 1) {
                return accumulator;
            } else {
                return sum_inner(accumulator + number, number - 1);
            }
        }
    }

    // ---
    // An application of VSSS - the very sly stack simulator
    // Replaces "recur/fpij/Factorial.java" on p.141
    // ---

    private static class SumRecursivelyWithVSSS {

        public static long sum(final int number) {
            return sum_inner(1, number).invoke();
        }

        // Note that this method is *never* called recursively!

        public static TailCall<Long> sum_inner(final long accumulator, final int number) {
            if (number == 1) {
                // Return the "TailCalls" instance that ends the stream
                return TailCalls.done(accumulator);
            } else {
                // "call()" does nothing, and we could just return the closure directly, but it looks nice
                return TailCalls.call(
                        // When called by Stream.iterate(), this closure is supposed to generate&return the
                        // "next TailCall instance" of the stream
                        () -> sum_inner(accumulator + number, number - 1)
                );
            }
        }
    }

    // === TESTING SUPPORT BEGINS ===

    private static boolean callSum(final boolean skip, final String name, int n, Function<Integer, Long> sum) {
        boolean skipNextTime = skip;
        if (!skip) {
            try {
                long res = sum.apply(n);
                // Properly, this test should be in the caller
                if (n == limit - 1) {
                    System.out.println("Reached the end: " + name + "(" + n + ") = " + res);
                }
            } catch (StackOverflowError err) {
                System.out.println("Stack overflow for " + name + "(" + n + ")");
                skipNextTime = true;
            }
        }
        return skipNextTime;
    }

    // Running the three approaches at summing recursively till stack overflow occurs!
    // Works best if one reduces the maximum stack size of the JVM,
    // options "-Xss1m" or "-XX:ThreadStackSize=1024" (the latter in KiB)
    // See https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/specs/man/java.html#advanced-runtime-options-for-java
    //
    // Example output:
    //
    // Stack overflow for SumRecursivelyNaively.sum(38919)
    // Stack overflow for SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls.sum(58375)
    // Reached the end: SumRecursivelyWithVSSS.sum(69999) = 2449965000

    @Test
    public void runThem() {
        boolean skipNaiveVersion = false;
        boolean skipTailCallVersion = false;
        boolean skipVsssVersion = false;
        for (int n = 1; n < limit && !(skipTailCallVersion && skipNaiveVersion && skipVsssVersion); n += 1) {
            skipNaiveVersion = callSum(skipNaiveVersion, "SumRecursivelyNaively.sum", n, SumRecursivelyNaively::sum);
            skipTailCallVersion = callSum(skipTailCallVersion, "SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls.sum", n, SumRecursivelyUsingTailCalls::sum);
            skipVsssVersion = callSum(skipVsssVersion, "SumRecursivelyWithVSSS.sum", n, SumRecursivelyWithVSSS::sum);
        }
    }

}

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

jimmykiang
This test is broken right out of the box… — FAIL: TestAgent (7.82s) agent_test.go:77: Error Trace: agent_test.go:77 agent_test.go:...
New
New
johnp
Running the examples in chapter 5 c under pytest 5.4.1 causes an AttributeError: ‘module’ object has no attribute ‘config’. In particula...
New
raul
Page 28: It implements io.ReaderAt on the store type. Sorry if it’s a dumb question but was the io.ReaderAt supposed to be io.ReadAt? ...
New
patoncrispy
I’m new to Rust and am using this book to learn more as well as to feed my interest in game dev. I’ve just finished the flappy dragon exa...
New
jskubick
I think I might have found a problem involving SwitchCompat, thumbTint, and trackTint. As entered, the SwitchCompat changes color to hol...
New
brunogirin
When I run the coverage example to report on missing lines, I get: pytest --cov=cards --report=term-missing ch7 ERROR: usage: pytest [op...
New
AufHe
I’m a newbie to Rails 7 and have hit an issue with the bin/Dev script mentioned on pages 112-113. Iteration A1 - Seeing the list of prod...
New
New
gorkaio
root_layout: {PentoWeb.LayoutView, :root}, This results in the following following error: no “root” html template defined for PentoWeb...
New

Other popular topics Top

Devtalk
Hello Devtalk World! Please let us know a little about who you are and where you’re from :nerd_face:
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Andy and Dave wrote this influential, classic book to help their clients create better software and rediscover the joy of coding. Almost ...
New
AstonJ
Or looking forward to? :nerd_face:
502 14279 275
New
DevotionGeo
I know that -t flag is used along with -i flag for getting an interactive shell. But I cannot digest what the man page for docker run com...
New
AstonJ
You might be thinking we should just ask who’s not using VSCode :joy: however there are some new additions in the space that might give V...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Build highly interactive applications without ever leaving Elixir, the way the experts do. Let LiveView take care of performance, scalabi...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Build efficient applications that exploit the unique benefits of a pure functional language, learning from an engineer who uses Haskell t...
New
New
mindriot
Ok, well here are some thoughts and opinions on some of the ergonomic keyboards I have, I guess like mini review of each that I use enoug...
New

Latest in Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition

Functional Programming in Java, Second Edition Portal

Sub Categories: