lirux

lirux

The Ray Tracer Challenge: "Computing the normal on a transformed sphere" ebook test

Hi Jamis,
I think there’s an issue with a test on chapter 6. I own the ebook, version P1.0 Feb. 2019.
This test doesn’t pass for me:

But removing the rotation_z transformation the test will pass.
I suppose that a previous errata updated the transformation matrix m but not the resulting normal vector n.
This is my normal with the rotation_z:
x: -0.4149850363522584, y: 0.8620719608670172, z: -0.29089405956569586

Hope it helps!

Marked As Solved

jdunlap

jdunlap

I think that I see the problem. You are applying the transformations in the wrong order. You are not rotating an ellipsoid in that test at all. Transformations are applied to a point in the opposite direction of what they appear, so in this test, the sphere is rotated and then scaled.

Perhaps this image will help to illustrate.

The blue ellipsoid is generated using the the order in the test (Scaling * Rotation) while the pinkish one is generated with the opposite order (Rotation * Scaling). This demonstrates that you are rotating a sphere in the test and then squishing it to an ellipsoid, not the other way around.

I agree with you that the other way would definitely rotate the normal, but I don’t believe it would in this case. Perhaps maybe Jamis intended for the second case when he made this correction, but inadvertently used this one which has no effect with or without the rotation.

Also Liked

lirux

lirux

Yes, you are right.
In my code I choose a fluent API, in witch the order of the matrix multiplications is reversed behind the scene.
So instead of using scaling(1, 0.5, 1).rotation_z(pi/5) (that equals to m = rotation_z * scaling) I should have written the opposite: rotation_z(pi/5).scaling(1, 0.5, 1).

Thank you for your help!

jdunlap

jdunlap

I don’t think that you’re right about this. Mine passes all tests with the z-axis rotation in. It also passes without, but that actually makes sense. First, we would rotate the original point into world space. We would then find the vector and then rotate it back to world space, causing it to point in the same direction as before. Without the rotation, we just don’t do and then undo the rotation. The rotation in this test does pretty much nothing because we already have the intersection point. It would be very different (in later chapters) when we cast a ray from world space in a direction to intersect the sphere. Then, it will make quite a bit of difference.

Please correct me if my logic is off, and I have not done the math by hand to verify all of this, but it makes logical sense to me. And my tests are passing without making any changes like you recommend.

mx00s

mx00s

@jamis

I ran into this too. I’m also using a fluent interface and transcribed the test wrong. Thank you both for helping me understand what’s going wrong.

It’s a bit odd that the rotation is even part of the transformation since it’s clearly a no-op when applied to the unit sphere centered on the object origin. After fixing my test transcription bug, I came up with an alternative test where each part of the transform has a meaningful impact:

Scenario: Given the normal on a transformed sphere
Given s <- sphere()
And m <- scaling(1, 0.5, 1) * shearing(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
And set_transform(s, m)
When n <- normal_at(s, point(0, sqrt(2)/2, sqrt(2)/2))
Then n = vector(-0.24077171, 0.96308684, -0.120385855)

But beware, I have not verified the computation beyond using my implementation to get the normal vector. Also, note if you’re using a fluent interface for your transforms, the identity should be followed by shearing.

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

jimschubert
In Chapter 3, the source for index introduces Config on page 31, followed by more code including tests; Config isn’t introduced until pag...
New
yulkin
your book suggests to use Image.toByteData() to convert image to bytes, however I get the following error: "the getter ‘toByteData’ isn’t...
New
mikecargal
Title: Hands-on Rust: question about get_component (page 295) (feel free to respond. “You dug you’re own hole… good luck”) I have somet...
New
leonW
I ran this command after installing the sample application: $ cards add do something --owner Brian And got a file not found error: Fil...
New
jskubick
I’m running Android Studio “Arctic Fox” 2020.3.1 Patch 2, and I’m embarrassed to admit that I only made it to page 8 before running into ...
New
Charles
In general, the book isn’t yet updated for Phoenix version 1.6. On page 18 of the book, the authors indicate that an auto generated of ro...
New
oaklandgit
Hi, I completed chapter 6 but am getting the following error when running: thread 'main' panicked at 'Failed to load texture: IoError(O...
New
adamwoolhether
Is there any place where we can discuss the solutions to some of the exercises? I can figure most of them out, but am having trouble with...
New
mert
AWDWR 7, page 152, page 153: Hello everyone, I’m a little bit lost on the hotwire part. I didn’t fully understand it. On page 152 @rub...
New
davetron5000
Hello faithful readers! If you have tried to follow along in the book, you are asked to start up the dev environment via dx/build and ar...
New

Other popular topics Top

AstonJ
A thread that every forum needs! Simply post a link to a track on YouTube (or SoundCloud or Vimeo amongst others!) on a separate line an...
New
Exadra37
I am thinking in building or buy a desktop computer for programing, both professionally and on my free time, and my choice of OS is Linux...
New
New
AstonJ
poll poll Be sure to check out @Dusty’s article posted here: An Introduction to Alternative Keyboard Layouts It’s one of the best write-...
New
AstonJ
We have a thread about the keyboards we have, but what about nice keyboards we come across that we want? If you have seen any that look n...
New
AstonJ
I’ve been hearing quite a lot of comments relating to the sound of a keyboard, with one of the most desirable of these called ‘thock’, he...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Build highly interactive applications without ever leaving Elixir, the way the experts do. Let LiveView take care of performance, scalabi...
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
AstonJ
Was just curious to see if any were around, found this one: I got 51/100: Not sure if it was meant to buy I am sure at times the b...
New
DevotionGeo
I have always used antique keyboards like Cherry MX 1800 or Cherry MX 8100 and almost always have modified the switches in some way, like...
New

Sub Categories: