The_Exile

The_Exile

Not fully understanding the code in the example in "Learn to Program"

So I am not getting similar code to what Chris is when I do the examples he wants us to do, and many of the things he brings up after Chapter 6 seem to be lacking some explanation to create a full understanding so I can fully absorb the concept.

Everything in previous chapters, we would get similar looking stuff. It’s only now that we’ve gotten to branching and looping, and everything afterward that things completely fall apart for me.

Deaf Grandma

My code

puts ''
puts ''

gma = 'Grandma replies: HUH?! SPEAK UP, SONNY!'

year = ''

year_roll = rand(20)

gma_canhear = 'Grandma replies: NO, NOT SINCE ' + year + '!'

if year_roll == 0
	year = '1930'
	elsif year_roll == 1
		year = '1931'
		elsif year_roll == 2
			year = '1932'
			elsif year_roll == 3
				year = '1933'
				elsif year_roll == 4
					year = '1934'
					elsif year_roll == 5
						year = '1935'
						elsif year_roll == 6
							year = '1936'
							elsif year_roll == 7
								year =  '1937'
								elsif year_roll == 8
									year =  '1938'
									elsif year_roll == 9
										year =  '1939'
										elsif year_roll == 10
											year = '1940'
											elsif year_roll == 11
												year =  '1941'
												elsif year_roll == 12
													year = '1942'
													elsif year_roll == 13
														year = '1943'
														elsif year_roll == 14
															year = '1944'
															elsif year_roll == 15
																year = '1945'
																elsif year_roll == 16
																	year = '1946'
																	elsif year_roll == 17
																		year = '1947'
																		elsif year_roll == 18
																			year = '1948'
																			elsif year_roll == 19
																				year = '1949'
																				else year_roll == 20
																					year = '1950'																					
end

gma_canhear = 'Grandma replies: NO, NOT SINCE ' + year + '!' 
#Update gma_canhear variable with year value after the year_roll if branch.

wistg = 'a' 
# what I say to grandma = wistg | This is it's inital value before being updated. If I left it blank it 
# would cause an error. I don't know why.

while wistg != wistg.upcase
	puts 'You say to Grandma...'
	wistg = gets.chomp
	puts ''
		if wistg == wistg.upcase
			puts ''
			puts gma_canhear
			puts ''
			elsif wistg == 'BYE'
				break
				else 	puts gma
						puts ''
			end
end

puts ''
puts ''

Chris’ code

puts 'HEY THERE, SONNY! GIVE GRANDMA A KISS!'
while true
said = gets.chomp
if said == "BYE"
puts 'BYE SWEETIE!'
break
end
if said != said.upcase
puts 'HUH?! SPEAK UP, SONNY!'
else
random_year = 1930 + rand(21)
puts 'NO, NOT SINCE ' + random_year.to_s + '!'
end
end

or

puts 'HEY THERE, SONNY! GIVE GRANDMA A KISS!'
while true
said = gets.chomp
break if said == "BYE"
response = if said != said.upcase
'HUH?! SPEAK UP, SONNY!'
else
"NO, NOT SINCE #{rand(1930..1950)}!"
end
puts response
end
puts 'BYE SWEETIE!'

His code is vastly more compact. I just don’t understand how he was able to do that. I barely understand what he did.

I did what I could, with what I learned form the book up to that point and never in my wildest dreams would I have come up with anything like what he did.

===

Most Liked

AstonJ

AstonJ

Firstly, well done for writing what you did! I wouldn’t worry too much about it being different to what Chris wrote because often programmers will quite write something just to get things working, then they’ll rewrite (refactor) their code to make it better. That could be to make it shorter, or to reorganise or split it up into multiple methods to make it easier to maintain and re-use etc. The thing to note is that this is completely normal - what you end up with is often quite different to your first attempt :smiley:

Ok let’s have a look at Chris’s code:

puts 'HEY THERE, SONNY! GIVE GRANDMA A KISS!'
while true
  users_input = gets.chomp
  if users_input == "BYE"
    puts 'BYE SWEETIE!'
    break
  end
  if users_input != users_input.upcase
    puts 'HUH?! SPEAK UP, SONNY!'
  else
    random_year = 1930 + rand(21)
    puts 'NO, NOT SINCE ' + random_year.to_s + '!'
  end
end

I have changed it very slightly - I changed the name of the said variable, to users_input.

The program starts by printing “HEY THERE, SONNY! GIVE GRANDMA A KISS!” and then waits for user input with the gets.chomp command. By prefixing it with users_input = means the result of it will be bound to the users_input variable - which means you can then use/do something with the result.

Which is exactly what you do with the code below it; if users_input == "BYE" this is what you’ll use to terminate the program, so it needs to be assessed before anything else. If the user’s input is ‘BYE’ the program terminates by first saying “BYE SWEETIE!” then break.

If the user’s input isn’t “BYE” then that bit of code is ignored and the program moves on to the next bit of code: if users_input != users_input.upcase and what that’s doing is asking the computer to check whether the user’s input is in capital letters, which is what upcase is used for. The != bit means ‘does not’ so that full line of code is saying: let’s compare the user’s input to what we want it to to be - the user’s input in capitol letters, so for example if the user’s input was “please give me a kiss” and what we wanted was “PLEASE GIVE ME A KISS” then they would not be equal, making the if users_input != users_input.upcase statement true, which would then execute the code in that block, which is puts 'HUH?! SPEAK UP, SONNY!'.

The final part of the code will run if the user’s input is in capital letters, and in that case the program will first create a random year by choosing a random number from 0 to 21 with the rand(21) function and assign that year to the random_year variable, and then print “NO, NOT SINCE” along with the random_year converted to a string with the to_s method (followed by an exclamation mark).

Does that make sense? If so here’s what I recommend you do - change it! Alter the code to do something a little bit different. When you start doing that it will make even more sense!

Btw, I’ve split this into a dedicated thread as it could help someone else stuck on the same exercise :+1:

chrispine

chrispine

Author of Learn to Program

Yes, my book is geared for the beginner, and was specifically intended to be a springboard for the Pickaxe, which was already an excellent book. I was just trying to fill that gap.

And about my omission of parens in method definitions: that was the style 17 years ago when I first started working on this book. I am currently working on the 3rd Edition (I think this sentence is the first time I’ve said so publicly), and it includes parens for method definitions and most method calls (as well as numerous other changes, a totally new chapter, etc).

Margaret

Margaret

Editor at PragProg

So excited to have your new edition coming out, Chris! And thank you for being so generous with your time. I have seen how much you help your readers when they get stuck. It’s so valuable to have that kind of support when learning!

Popular Backend topics Top

PragmaticBookshelf
Don’t accept the compromise between fast and beautiful: you can have it all. Phoenix creator Chris McCord, Elixir creator José Valim, and...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Your domain is rich and interconnected, and your API should be, too. Upgrade your web API to GraphQL, using flexible queries to empower y...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
For this new edition of the best-selling Learn to Program, Chris Pine has taken a good thing and made it even better. First, he used the ...
New
pillaiindu
Cross posting from HashNode. A friend of mine is creating Uber-like app for a small company with 200 to 1000 cars. The app will operate ...
New
Kurisu
Following on an old discussion I started on Elixir Forum here, I finally made my mind to learn Ruby on Rails in addition to Elixir/Phoen...
New
ohm
Does anybody have good learning resources with regards to going into Event Driven Design, Architecture or Sourcing? I got recommended Er...
New
ManningBooks
Deep Learning with Python, Second Edition is a comprehensive introduction to the field of deep learning using Python and the powerful Ker...
New
ManningBooks
Kubernetes in Action, Second Edition teaches you to use Kubernetes to deploy container-based distributed applications. You'll start with ...
New
JimmyCarterSon
Hello, I am. very new to Elixir lang I have only been doing it for about 2 weeks. I recently started following this tutorial todo list, ...
New
ManningBooks
Spring Security in Action, Second Edition is a revised version of the bestselling original, fully updated for Spring Boot 3 and Oauth2/Op...
New

Other popular topics Top

dasdom
No chair. I have a standing desk. This post was split into a dedicated thread from our thread about chairs :slight_smile:
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Design and develop sophisticated 2D games that are as much fun to make as they are to play. From particle effects and pathfinding to soci...
New
Rainer
My first contact with Erlang was about 2 years ago when I used RabbitMQ, which is written in Erlang, for my job. This made me curious and...
New
mafinar
Crystal recently reached version 1. I had been following it for awhile but never got to really learn it. Most languages I picked up out o...
New
AstonJ
We’ve talked about his book briefly here but it is quickly becoming obsolete - so he’s decided to create a series of 7 podcasts, the firs...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Rails 7 completely redefines what it means to produce fantastic user experiences and provides a way to achieve all the benefits of single...
New
AstonJ
If you get Can't find emacs in your PATH when trying to install Doom Emacs on your Mac you… just… need to install Emacs first! :lol: bre...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Erin Dees @undees Welcome to our new author spotlight! We had the pleasure of chatting with Erin Dees, co-author of ...
New
AstonJ
This is cool! DEEPSEEK-V3 ON M4 MAC: BLAZING FAST INFERENCE ON APPLE SILICON We just witnessed something incredible: the largest open-s...
New