NKTgLaw

NKTgLaw

Building a Computational Model of Planetary Motion (NKTg) and Validating It with NASA Mercury Data

1. Problem Statement

Can planetary motion be simulated using only fundamental quantities such as:

  • Position (x)

  • Velocity (v)

  • Mass (m)

without explicitly using force equations?

This post presents a computational implementation of the NKTg model, where orbital velocity is derived from a target constant:

NKTg₁ = x × p
where p = m × v

The model is validated using publicly available data from NASA JPL Horizons for Mercury.


2. Reference Dataset (NASA 2024)

Actual orbital data of Mercury in 2024:

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v
1/1/2024 5.16E+10 5.33E+04 3.30E+23 1.76E+28
4/1/2024 6.97E+10 3.90E+04 3.30E+23 1.29E+28
7/1/2024 5.36E+10 5.20E+04 3.30E+23 1.72E+28
10/1/2024 6.95E+10 3.92E+04 3.30E+23 1.30E+28
12/31/2024 4.64E+10 5.81E+04 3.30E+23 1.92E+28

From this dataset, the target constant is established:

NKTg₁ = 8.90E+38 NKTm


3. Model Definition

Given:

  • x (orbital position)

  • m (mass)

  • Target constant NKTg₁

We compute:

p=NKTg1xp = \frac{NKTg₁}{x}p=xNKTg1​​v=pmv = \frac{p}{m}v=mp​

No force expressions are used in the computation.

The model also integrates mass variation:

dm/dt = -0.5 kg/s

This produces:

NKTg2=(dm/dt)×pNKTg₂ = (dm/dt) × pNKTg2​=(dm/dt)×p

which remains negative throughout the orbit.


4. 2025 Simulation (NKTg Model)

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v
1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.22E+04 3.301E+23 1.72E+28
4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.87E+04 3.301E+23 1.28E+28
7/1/2025 5.49E+10 4.91E+04 3.301E+23 1.62E+28
10/1/2025 6.83E+10 3.95E+04 3.301E+23 1.30E+28
12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.85E+04 3.301E+23 1.93E+28

5. Actual NASA Data (2025)

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg)
1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.34E+04 3.30E+23
4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.89E+04 3.30E+23
7/1/2025 5.49E+10 5.04E+04 3.30E+23
1/10/2025 6.83E+10 3.98E+04 3.30E+23
12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.89E+04 3.30E+23

6. Numerical Comparison

Date v – NKTg v – NASA Relative Error (%)
1/1/2025 5.22E+04 53400 -2.15461
4/1/2025 3.87E+04 38900 -0.562786
7/1/2025 4.91E+04 50400 -2.561981
1/10/2025 3.95E+04 39800 -0.819213
12/31/2025 5.85E+04 58900 -0.707806

Average relative error: 1.3%


7. Observations from a Computational Perspective

  • The system is fully defined by interaction between x, v, and m.

  • No force expressions are required in the computation process.

  • The model is deterministic and reproducible across platforms.

  • Error remains within ~1.3% compared to NASA JPL data.


8. Discussion

From a software engineering perspective, this approach represents:

  • A constant-driven orbital simulation model.

  • A reduced-parameter dynamical system.

  • A reproducible computational experiment based on publicly available data.

The implementation can be reproduced in any language supporting floating-point arithmetic.


If anyone is interested, I can share a minimal reproducible implementation (Python / C++ / Go) for benchmarking and independent validation.

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics Top

AstonJ
Thread to discuss ideas and thoughts on how developers might be able help in the Coronavirus pandemic.
New
KyleHunter
What is a good language for beginners to make apps like snapchat and instagram?
New
axelson
Can anyone recommend a tmux session switcher? I’ve used https://github.com/siadat/session-finder in the past but it’s not very actively m...
New
finner
One of my 2021 resolutions is to read more tech books. As part of this effort I purchased two MEAPs (Manning Early Access Program) which...
New
DevotionGeo
The V Programming Language Simple language for building maintainable programs V is already mentioned couple of times in the forum, but I...
New
AstonJ
Just listened to @rvirding’s interview here and he mentions #lua (and Luerl) - just wondered if anyone’s used Lua and what you think of it?
New
Exadra37
Your users of the two forums are spread across the world, thus I am curious how did you solved it?
New
DevotionGeo
I am planning to refresh my Ruby knowledge in a month or two, after using other technologies more frequently for a few years. Luckily I w...
New
AstonJ
Thought this would be a nice way to start the year - have you seen or written a function (or method) or piece of code that you are partic...
New
AntonRich
I don’t know what happened today. But I just started reading SICP which I meant to do for a long time. The book itself: I’m not even s...
New

Other popular topics Top

PragmaticBookshelf
Instantly view the changes you make to an app with stateful hot reload, and define a declarative UI in the same language as the app logic...
New
siddhant3030
I’m thinking of buying a monitor that I can rotate to use as a vertical monitor? Also, I want to know if someone is using it for program...
New
dasdom
No chair. I have a standing desk. This post was split into a dedicated thread from our thread about chairs :slight_smile:
New
AstonJ
There’s a whole world of custom keycaps out there that I didn’t know existed! Check out all of our Keycaps threads here: https://forum....
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
AstonJ
If you get Can't find emacs in your PATH when trying to install Doom Emacs on your Mac you… just… need to install Emacs first! :lol: bre...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Jamis Buck @jamis This month, we have the pleasure of spotlighting author Jamis Buck, who has written Mazes for Prog...
New
First poster: bot
zig/http.zig at 7cf2cbb33ef34c1d211135f56d30fe23b6cacd42 · ziglang/zig. General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaini...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Use advanced functional programming principles, practical Domain-Driven Design techniques, and production-ready Elixir code to build scal...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Lint your docs like code: turn any style guide into enforceable rules with Vale and publish clear, consistent content every time. ...
New