NKTgLaw

NKTgLaw

Building a Computational Model of Planetary Motion (NKTg) and Validating It with NASA Mercury Data

1. Problem Statement

Can planetary motion be simulated using only fundamental quantities such as:

  • Position (x)

  • Velocity (v)

  • Mass (m)

without explicitly using force equations?

This post presents a computational implementation of the NKTg model, where orbital velocity is derived from a target constant:

NKTg₁ = x × p
where p = m × v

The model is validated using publicly available data from NASA JPL Horizons for Mercury.


2. Reference Dataset (NASA 2024)

Actual orbital data of Mercury in 2024:

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v
1/1/2024 5.16E+10 5.33E+04 3.30E+23 1.76E+28
4/1/2024 6.97E+10 3.90E+04 3.30E+23 1.29E+28
7/1/2024 5.36E+10 5.20E+04 3.30E+23 1.72E+28
10/1/2024 6.95E+10 3.92E+04 3.30E+23 1.30E+28
12/31/2024 4.64E+10 5.81E+04 3.30E+23 1.92E+28

From this dataset, the target constant is established:

NKTg₁ = 8.90E+38 NKTm


3. Model Definition

Given:

  • x (orbital position)

  • m (mass)

  • Target constant NKTg₁

We compute:

p=NKTg1xp = \frac{NKTg₁}{x}p=xNKTg1​​v=pmv = \frac{p}{m}v=mp​

No force expressions are used in the computation.

The model also integrates mass variation:

dm/dt = -0.5 kg/s

This produces:

NKTg2=(dm/dt)×pNKTg₂ = (dm/dt) × pNKTg2​=(dm/dt)×p

which remains negative throughout the orbit.


4. 2025 Simulation (NKTg Model)

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v
1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.22E+04 3.301E+23 1.72E+28
4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.87E+04 3.301E+23 1.28E+28
7/1/2025 5.49E+10 4.91E+04 3.301E+23 1.62E+28
10/1/2025 6.83E+10 3.95E+04 3.301E+23 1.30E+28
12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.85E+04 3.301E+23 1.93E+28

5. Actual NASA Data (2025)

Date x (m) v (m/s) m (kg)
1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.34E+04 3.30E+23
4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.89E+04 3.30E+23
7/1/2025 5.49E+10 5.04E+04 3.30E+23
1/10/2025 6.83E+10 3.98E+04 3.30E+23
12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.89E+04 3.30E+23

6. Numerical Comparison

Date v – NKTg v – NASA Relative Error (%)
1/1/2025 5.22E+04 53400 -2.15461
4/1/2025 3.87E+04 38900 -0.562786
7/1/2025 4.91E+04 50400 -2.561981
1/10/2025 3.95E+04 39800 -0.819213
12/31/2025 5.85E+04 58900 -0.707806

Average relative error: 1.3%


7. Observations from a Computational Perspective

  • The system is fully defined by interaction between x, v, and m.

  • No force expressions are required in the computation process.

  • The model is deterministic and reproducible across platforms.

  • Error remains within ~1.3% compared to NASA JPL data.


8. Discussion

From a software engineering perspective, this approach represents:

  • A constant-driven orbital simulation model.

  • A reduced-parameter dynamical system.

  • A reproducible computational experiment based on publicly available data.

The implementation can be reproduced in any language supporting floating-point arithmetic.


If anyone is interested, I can share a minimal reproducible implementation (Python / C++ / Go) for benchmarking and independent validation.

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics Top

AstonJ
I just watched this: (tldr: remove bad choices so you don’t need to use willpower) It got me thinking about ways to incre...
New
AstonJ
:smiling_imp: What is your preferred syntax style and why? Perhaps we can add examples and use the code below as a simple reference poi...
New
Exadra37
Cloudflare as workers to run serverless code without using containers: So it seems that Isolates is based on: What we ended up settl...
New
AstonJ
Inspired by this tweet by @dasdom Even if you take out all the damage being done by humans, our planet has about 50B years before bein...
New
AstonJ
Always interested in seeing what apps people use and how they organise their phones/home screens! Here’s mine…
New
AstonJ
Curious to know which languages and frameworks you’re all thinking about learning next :upside_down_face: Perhaps if there’s enough peop...
New
AstonJ
The dev world doesn’t sit still, in fact it is probably one of the fastest paced industries around - meaning to stay current we are conti...
New
AstonJ
Things like smart speakers (such Amazon Alexa), smart TVs or other devices with built in microphones, cameras or with other features that...
New
AstonJ
Continuing the discussion from Thinking about learning Crystal, let’s discuss - I was wondering which languages don’t GC - maybe we can c...
New
Exadra37
My brother got a VPS on https://contabo.com hosting provider, but I was not aware of them, and when my brother told me the price and spec...
New

Other popular topics Top

Devtalk
Hello Devtalk World! Please let us know a little about who you are and where you’re from :nerd_face:
New
AstonJ
If it’s a mechanical keyboard, which switches do you have? Would you recommend it? Why? What will your next keyboard be? Pics always w...
New
siddhant3030
I’m thinking of buying a monitor that I can rotate to use as a vertical monitor? Also, I want to know if someone is using it for program...
New
dasdom
No chair. I have a standing desk. This post was split into a dedicated thread from our thread about chairs :slight_smile:
New
AstonJ
poll poll Be sure to check out @Dusty’s article posted here: An Introduction to Alternative Keyboard Layouts It’s one of the best write-...
New
AstonJ
This looks like a stunning keycap set :orange_heart: A LEGENDARY KEYBOARD LIVES ON When you bought an Apple Macintosh computer in the e...
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Mike Riley @mriley This month, we turn the spotlight on Mike Riley, author of Portable Python Projects. Mike’s book ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Leverage Elixir and the Nx ecosystem to build intelligent applications that solve real-world problems in computer vision, natural languag...
New
AnfaengerAlex
Hello, I’m a beginner in Android development and I’m facing an issue with my project setup. In my build.gradle.kts file, I have the foll...
New