
CommunityNews
It’s True, “We” Don’t Care About Accessibility on Linux
What do virtue-signalers and privileged people without disabilities sharing content about accessibility on Linux being trash have in common? They don’t actually really care about the group they’re defending; they just exploit these victims’ unfortunate situation to either fuel hate against groups and projects actually trying to make the world a better place. I never thought I’d be this upset to a point I’d be writing an article about something this sensitive with a clickbait-y title. It’s simultaneously demotivating, unproductive, and infuriating. I’m here writing this post fully knowing that I could have been working on accessibility in GNOME, but really, I’m so tired of having my mood ruined because of privileged people spending at most 5 minutes to write erroneous posts and then pretending to be oblivious when confronted while it takes us 5 months of unpaid work to get a quarter of recognition, let alone acknowledgment, without accounting for the time “wasted” addressing these accusations.
Read in full here:
Popular Linux topics










Other popular topics










Categories:
Sub Categories:
Popular Portals
- /elixir
- /rust
- /wasm
- /ruby
- /erlang
- /phoenix
- /keyboards
- /rails
- /js
- /python
- /security
- /go
- /swift
- /vim
- /clojure
- /emacs
- /java
- /haskell
- /onivim
- /svelte
- /typescript
- /crystal
- /c-plus-plus
- /kotlin
- /tailwind
- /gleam
- /react
- /flutter
- /elm
- /ocaml
- /vscode
- /ash
- /opensuse
- /centos
- /php
- /deepseek
- /html
- /scala
- /zig
- /sublime-text
- /debian
- /textmate
- /nixos
- /lisp
- /agda
- /react-native
- /kubuntu
- /arch-linux
- /ubuntu
- /revery
- /spring
- /manjaro
- /django
- /diversity
- /lua
- /nodejs
- /julia
- /slackware
- /c
- /neovim