
rearick
Programming Ruby 3.2 (5th Edition) vB1.0: Duplicated "we" (p. 68)
@noelrappin On page 68 of the PDF in the paragraph preceding the fib_up_to method definition, the word “we” is duplicated.
The text reads:
“Continuing the example, let’s say we we want the method…”
Correction:
“Continuing the example, let’s say we want the method…”
First Post!

BernardK
Hi !
Nice to see another reviewer.
When I started to post errata for this book, I was new to devtalk. One day, after the fifth post, I received a message saying that being enthousiastic was nice, but for some reason I don’t remember, I was limited to 5 per day. So I started to group several errata in one post.
The post whose title is B1.0 pages 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 73 74, 79, 151, 222, 252, 264 contains an erratum for we we on page 68.
Now I’m no longer limited and I write one post per typo with a description in the title which makes it easier for other readers to see if the erratum has already been posted.
Kindly your.
Bernard
Popular Pragmatic topics










Other popular topics










Latest in PragProg
Latest (all)
Categories:
Popular Portals
- /elixir
- /rust
- /wasm
- /ruby
- /erlang
- /phoenix
- /keyboards
- /js
- /rails
- /python
- /security
- /go
- /swift
- /vim
- /clojure
- /java
- /haskell
- /emacs
- /svelte
- /onivim
- /typescript
- /crystal
- /c-plus-plus
- /tailwind
- /kotlin
- /gleam
- /react
- /flutter
- /elm
- /ocaml
- /vscode
- /opensuse
- /ash
- /centos
- /php
- /deepseek
- /zig
- /scala
- /html
- /debian
- /nixos
- /lisp
- /agda
- /textmate
- /react-native
- /sublime-text
- /kubuntu
- /arch-linux
- /ubuntu
- /revery
- /manjaro
- /spring
- /django
- /diversity
- /nodejs
- /lua
- /julia
- /c
- /slackware
- /neovim