seblegall

seblegall

Distributed Services with Go - Method log.Read() fails reading Records

Hi,

I’m currently reading your book. By doing so, I like to rewrite the code by myself. It helps me to deeply understand how it works.

However, I found something strange in the log package, concerning the Read() func. Let’s see that with a test example :

In the log_test.go file, the original test is :

func testAppendRead(t *testing.T, log *log.Log) {
	append := &api.Record{
		Value: []byte("hello world"),
	}
	off, err := log.Append(append)
	require.NoError(t, err)
	require.Equal(t, uint64(0), off)

	read, err := log.Read(off)
	require.NoError(t, err)
	require.Equal(t, append, read)

}

In this test, we write 1 record and read it.
Let’s write 4 records and read them:

func testAppendRead(t *testing.T, log *log.Log) {

	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
		append := &api.Record{
			Value: []byte(fmt.Sprintf("Hello World %d !", i)),
		}
		off, err := log.Append(append)
		require.NoError(t, err)
		require.Equal(t, uint64(i), off)

		read, err := log.Read(off)
		require.NoError(t, err)
		require.Equal(t, append, read)
	}

}

Here is what I get by running go test -v log_test.go :

=== RUN   TestLog
=== RUN   TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds
    TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds: log_test.go:48: 
                Error Trace:    log_test.go:48
                                                        log_test.go:32
                Error:          Received unexpected error:
                                offset out of range: 2
                Test:           TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds

I’m not sure why it fails, but I have understood that, in a log, segments are ordered from the oldest to the newest. It means the oldest will have a base offset of 0 (for example), the second will have a base offset of 2.

But then, there is this code in the Read method :

    var s *segment
	for _, segment := range l.segments {
               //The first segment we read is the oldest one. That is to say, the one
               //with a base offset equals to 0, right?
 		if segment.baseOffset <= off {
			s = segment
			break
		}
	}
	if s == nil || s.nextOffset <= off {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("offset out of range: %d", off)
	}

If we try to read offset 3, by reading the first (oldest) segment in the loop, we will have: segment.baseOffset = 0 <= 3 However, the Record with the offset 3 is in the segment which baseOffset is 2.

Did I miss something?

Most Liked

travisjeffery

travisjeffery

Author of Distributed Services with Go

Hey, yeah it should be implemented like this:

func (l *Log) Read(off uint64) (*api.Record, error) {
	l.mu.RLock()
	defer l.mu.RUnlock()
	var s *segment
	for _, segment := range l.segments {
		if segment.baseOffset <= off && off < segment.nextOffset {
			s = segment
			break
		}
	}
	// START: before
	if s == nil || s.nextOffset <= off {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("offset out of range: %d", off)
	}
	// END: before
	return s.Read(off)
}

I fixed a ton of issues that will be in the next beta, which should be out either late this week or next week.

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

New
telemachus
Python Testing With Pytest - Chapter 2, warnings for “unregistered custom marks” While running the smoke tests in Chapter 2, I get these...
New
jeffmcompsci
Title: Design and Build Great Web APIs - typo “https://company-atk.herokuapp.com/2258ie4t68jv” (page 19, third bullet in URL list) Typo:...
New
mikecargal
Title: Hands-On Rust (Chap 8 (Adding a Heads Up Display) It looks like ​.with_simple_console_no_bg​(SCREEN_WIDTH*2, SCREEN_HEIGHT*2...
New
raul
Page 28: It implements io.ReaderAt on the store type. Sorry if it’s a dumb question but was the io.ReaderAt supposed to be io.ReadAt? ...
New
alanq
This isn’t directly about the book contents so maybe not the right forum…but in some of the code apps (e.g. turbo/06) it sends a TURBO_ST...
New
cro
I am working on the “Your Turn” for chapter one and building out the restart button talked about on page 27. It recommends looking into ...
New
a.zampa
@mfazio23 I’m following the indications of the book and arriver ad chapter 10, but the app cannot be compiled due to an error in the Bas...
New
davetron5000
Hello faithful readers! If you have tried to follow along in the book, you are asked to start up the dev environment via dx/build and ar...
New
New

Other popular topics Top

PragmaticBookshelf
Learn from the award-winning programming series that inspired the Elixir language, and go on a step-by-step journey through the most impo...
New
Exadra37
Please tell us what is your preferred monitor setup for programming(not gaming) and why you have chosen it. Does your monitor have eye p...
New
AstonJ
You might be thinking we should just ask who’s not using VSCode :joy: however there are some new additions in the space that might give V...
New
Exadra37
Oh just spent so much time on this to discover now that RancherOS is in end of life but Rancher is refusing to mark the Github repo as su...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Learn different ways of writing concurrent code in Elixir and increase your application's performance, without sacrificing scalability or...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Build highly interactive applications without ever leaving Elixir, the way the experts do. Let LiveView take care of performance, scalabi...
New
foxtrottwist
A few weeks ago I started using Warp a terminal written in rust. Though in it’s current state of development there are a few caveats (tab...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight Jamis Buck @jamis This month, we have the pleasure of spotlighting author Jamis Buck, who has written Mazes for Prog...
New
AstonJ
If you want a quick and easy way to block any website on your Mac using Little Snitch simply… File &gt; New Rule: And select Deny, O...
New
NewsBot
Node.js v22.14.0 has been released. Link: Release 2025-02-11, Version 22.14.0 'Jod' (LTS), @aduh95 · nodejs/node · GitHub
New

Sub Categories: