seblegall

seblegall

Distributed Services with Go - Method log.Read() fails reading Records

Hi,

I’m currently reading your book. By doing so, I like to rewrite the code by myself. It helps me to deeply understand how it works.

However, I found something strange in the log package, concerning the Read() func. Let’s see that with a test example :

In the log_test.go file, the original test is :

func testAppendRead(t *testing.T, log *log.Log) {
	append := &api.Record{
		Value: []byte("hello world"),
	}
	off, err := log.Append(append)
	require.NoError(t, err)
	require.Equal(t, uint64(0), off)

	read, err := log.Read(off)
	require.NoError(t, err)
	require.Equal(t, append, read)

}

In this test, we write 1 record and read it.
Let’s write 4 records and read them:

func testAppendRead(t *testing.T, log *log.Log) {

	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
		append := &api.Record{
			Value: []byte(fmt.Sprintf("Hello World %d !", i)),
		}
		off, err := log.Append(append)
		require.NoError(t, err)
		require.Equal(t, uint64(i), off)

		read, err := log.Read(off)
		require.NoError(t, err)
		require.Equal(t, append, read)
	}

}

Here is what I get by running go test -v log_test.go :

=== RUN   TestLog
=== RUN   TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds
    TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds: log_test.go:48: 
                Error Trace:    log_test.go:48
                                                        log_test.go:32
                Error:          Received unexpected error:
                                offset out of range: 2
                Test:           TestLog/append_and_read_a_record_succeeds

I’m not sure why it fails, but I have understood that, in a log, segments are ordered from the oldest to the newest. It means the oldest will have a base offset of 0 (for example), the second will have a base offset of 2.

But then, there is this code in the Read method :

    var s *segment
	for _, segment := range l.segments {
               //The first segment we read is the oldest one. That is to say, the one
               //with a base offset equals to 0, right?
 		if segment.baseOffset <= off {
			s = segment
			break
		}
	}
	if s == nil || s.nextOffset <= off {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("offset out of range: %d", off)
	}

If we try to read offset 3, by reading the first (oldest) segment in the loop, we will have: segment.baseOffset = 0 <= 3 However, the Record with the offset 3 is in the segment which baseOffset is 2.

Did I miss something?

Most Liked

travisjeffery

travisjeffery

Author of Distributed Services with Go

Hey, yeah it should be implemented like this:

func (l *Log) Read(off uint64) (*api.Record, error) {
	l.mu.RLock()
	defer l.mu.RUnlock()
	var s *segment
	for _, segment := range l.segments {
		if segment.baseOffset <= off && off < segment.nextOffset {
			s = segment
			break
		}
	}
	// START: before
	if s == nil || s.nextOffset <= off {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("offset out of range: %d", off)
	}
	// END: before
	return s.Read(off)
}

I fixed a ton of issues that will be in the next beta, which should be out either late this week or next week.

Where Next?

Popular Pragmatic Bookshelf topics Top

abtin
page 20: … protoc command… I had to additionally run the following go get commands in order to be able to compile protobuf code using go...
New
New
iPaul
page 37 ANTLRInputStream input = new ANTLRInputStream(is); as of ANTLR 4 .8 should be: CharStream stream = CharStreams.fromStream(i...
New
herminiotorres
Hi! I know not the intentions behind this narrative when called, on page XI: mount() |&gt; handle_event() |&gt; render() but the correc...
New
AleksandrKudashkin
On the page xv there is an instruction to run bin/setup from the main folder. I downloaded the source code today (12/03/21) and can’t see...
New
Charles
In general, the book isn’t yet updated for Phoenix version 1.6. On page 18 of the book, the authors indicate that an auto generated of ro...
New
andreheijstek
After running /bin/setup, the first error was: The foreman' command exists in these Ruby versions: That was easy to fix: gem install fore...
New
New
redconfetti
Docker-Machine became part of the Docker Toolbox, which was deprecated in 2020, long after Docker Desktop supported Docker Engine nativel...
New
dachristenson
@mfazio23 Android Studio will not accept anything I do when trying to use the Transformations class, as described on pp. 140-141. Googl...
New

Other popular topics Top

Devtalk
Hello Devtalk World! Please let us know a little about who you are and where you’re from :nerd_face:
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Learn from the award-winning programming series that inspired the Elixir language, and go on a step-by-step journey through the most impo...
New
brentjanderson
Bought the Moonlander mechanical keyboard. Cherry Brown MX switches. Arms and wrists have been hurting enough that it’s time I did someth...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Rust is an exciting new programming language combining the power of C with memory safety, fearless concurrency, and productivity boosters...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Create efficient, elegant software tests in pytest, Python's most powerful testing framework. Brian Okken @brianokken Edited by Kat...
New
Maartz
Hi folks, I don’t know if I saw this here but, here’s a new programming language, called Roc Reminds me a bit of Elm and thus Haskell. ...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Author Spotlight: VM Brasseur @vmbrasseur We have a treat for you today! We turn the spotlight onto Open Source as we sit down with V...
New
First poster: bot
zig/http.zig at 7cf2cbb33ef34c1d211135f56d30fe23b6cacd42 · ziglang/zig. General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaini...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Overarching tutorial for Python beginner and intermediate developers that teaches web development with the Flask framework. Miguel Gr...
New

Sub Categories: