CommunityNews

CommunityNews

Why I don't like Tailwind CSS

You’re at a restaurant, and there’s an odd item on the menu that you’ve never heard of before, but it piques your interest. It sounds like it might be worth a try, though you’re not sure.

When the waiter approaches your table, you inquire about the dish; he notes that while most people are initially repulsed by its appearance, they should still give it a try because the chef swears that it’s supremely delicious. So, trusting his judgment, you order the dish and wait.

When your meal arrives, it looks just as unpleasant as it did in the menu. But you’re not one to judge—you’re willing to try new things. You carve into a slice of it and take a reluctant bite. And… well, it’s really not that great.

In a nutshell, this was my experience with Tailwind CSS. It’s not the worst thing to happen to CSS, but it’s certainly not the panacea that its supporters claim it is—and, in fact, it has a lot of problems…

This thread was posted by one of our members via one of our news source trackers.

Most Liked

alanq

alanq

Interesting article, some well made points but it only confirms to me that Tailwind probably is the right approach for me.

Every single approach has a trade off, and that can be presented as a criticism. But that doesn’t mean it might still not be the best approach available. Are the alternatives, whose trade offs aren’t touched on in this article, really better for a particular use case?

Maybe it’s just me, but my HTML is a bit ugly and not very readable anyway. It doesn’t feel like much of a sacrifice to have more, and initially obscure looking, html classes in it.

An example of a criticism from the article that is actually a plus for me:

you’re lying to yourself if you think this is any better than writing CSS directly, or any more maintainable than directly applying inline styles. Because instead of repeating styles in your CSS, you’re now repeating them in your HTML, through class names. In fact, you’re likely repeating yourself three, four, possibly many more times now because you can’t chain selectors.

In my workflow, NOT having to open up a CSS file at all, being able to specify the presentation directly inline inside the view template, is a huge win and avoids disrupting my train of thought. It is massively better than writing CSS directly, for me.
And I can easily use helper methods to DRY up commonly repeated sets of classes (with Ruby on Rails view helpers in my case).

Opinionated is great, but this article reads quite biased to be honest. Just a warning to anyone who reads the snippet without reading the full article and considering for themselves whether alternatives really would be better.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

I had almost the same thoughts reading it. I was like: “wait… putting style class names inside HTML is a bad thing?” WTF? I always did it like this – I am not a frontender and I only occasionally need to write HTML+CSS (mostly for hobby projects) and to me that’s actually a good thing. As you said, less interruptions.

I’d be open to something like LESS / SASS / SCSS as well though. But IMO for most small projects any of those would be a total overkill.

malloryerik

malloryerik

I’m personally liking Tailwind. My own pain points with it (minor pain, more like aches or itches…) are around stuff like combining Tailwind’s versions of CSS Grid and Flexbox which I already don’t use frequently enough to remember without constantly checking the docs, but which require enough understanding that now I’m checking two sets of docs instead of one.

Ah, this looks nice:

Where Next?

Popular Frontend topics Top

First poster: bot
You can write fast, modern, responsive web applications by generating your HTML on the server, and delivering that (with a little help) d...
New
CommunityNews
As JavaScript developers, the sheer amount of stuff we’re expected to know is enormous, and it grows bigger every day. With so many diff...
New
First poster: bot
Hey! We’re getting really close to releasing React + Vue support for Tailwind UI, so I thought it would be interesting to share some of t...
New
First poster: bot
JavaScript is a great programming language, but thanks to the fact that its initial release was built in only ten days back in 1995, coup...
/js
New
First poster: bot
Let’s build a fully functioning and settable “analog” clock with CSS custom properties and the calc() function. Then we’ll convert it int...
New
First poster: bot
In this article, we will look at the fascinating evolution of graphics in browsers from the prehistoric days of the early browsers. We wi...
/js
New
First poster: bot
TypeScript’s never type is very under-discussed, because it’s not nearly as ubiquitous or inescapable as other types. A TypeScript beginn...
New
First poster: bot
Star Wars Scene Transition Effects in CSS. You know those wipe transitions between scenes in Star Wars movies? Have you ever thought it ...
New
ragamuf
A little halloween hocus-pocus on the value proposition of having a reliable test suite in place. You are not scared, are you?
New
sundi
Learn to customize the Error HTML module in Phoenix LiveView, while enhancing the UX and retaining the typed URLs on branded 404 pages. ...
New

Other popular topics Top

DevotionGeo
I know that -t flag is used along with -i flag for getting an interactive shell. But I cannot digest what the man page for docker run com...
New
AstonJ
I’ve been hearing quite a lot of comments relating to the sound of a keyboard, with one of the most desirable of these called ‘thock’, he...
New
AstonJ
Thanks to @foxtrottwist’s and @Tomas’s posts in this thread: Poll: Which code editor do you use? I bought Onivim! :nerd_face: https://on...
New
AstonJ
Continuing the discussion from Thinking about learning Crystal, let’s discuss - I was wondering which languages don’t GC - maybe we can c...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Create efficient, elegant software tests in pytest, Python's most powerful testing framework. Brian Okken @brianokken Edited by Kat...
New
AstonJ
Saw this on TikTok of all places! :lol: Anyone heard of them before? Lite:
New
AstonJ
If you get Can't find emacs in your PATH when trying to install Doom Emacs on your Mac you… just… need to install Emacs first! :lol: bre...
New
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Programming Ruby is the most complete book on Ruby, covering both the language itself and the standard library as well as commonly used t...
New
PragmaticBookshelf
Develop, deploy, and debug BEAM applications using BEAMOps: a new paradigm that focuses on scalability, fault tolerance, and owning each ...
New