I have been looking through Seedance 2.0 prompt examples and noticed a pattern:

The prompts that work best are usually not just longer. They are more like small shot plans.

They separate:

• scene;

• subject;

• camera movement;

• timeline;

• style;

• consistency constraints.

For example, instead of writing:

A luxury watch commercial, cinematic lighting, slow motion, premium, realistic.

I would now write something closer to:

Scene: dark reflective studio surface.
Subject: one luxury watch, preserve dial shape and logo placement.
Camera: extreme close-up, then slow right orbit.
Timeline: 0-2s dial close-up, 2-5s orbit, 5-8s centered hero frame.
Style: premium commercial lighting, crisp reflections.
Constraints: no logo distortion, no extra text, no shape change, no abrupt cuts.

This makes it easier to debug the output. If the logo breaks, fix constraints. If the shot feels messy, simplify camera motion. If the action is unclear, rewrite the timeline.

We collected 160+ Seedance 2.0 prompt examples here:

https://github.com/EvoLinkAI/awesome-seedance-2.0-prompts

The visual prompt page is here:

https://evolink.ai/seedance-2-0-prompts?utm_source=community&utm_medium=devtalk&utm_campaign=seedance2_prompts_02

Curious how others are handling this:

• Do you write AI video prompts as paragraphs or structured blocks?

• Do you specify timeline beats like 0-2s, 2-5s, 5-8s?

• What has helped most with character or product consistency?