CommunityNews

ZFS 2.2.0 (RC): Block Cloning merged

Block Cloning by pjd · Pull Request #13392 · openzfs/zfs.
Motivation and Context
Block Cloning allows to clone a file (or a subset of its blocks) into another (or the same) file by just creating additional references to the data blocks without copying the…

Read in full here:

github.com/openzfs/zfs

Block Cloning

openzfs:master ← pjd:brt

opened 06:25AM - 30 Apr 22 UTC

pjd

+3480 -120

### Motivation and Context Block Cloning allows to clone a file (or a subset of its blocks) into another (or the same) file by just creating additional references to the data blocks without copying the data itself. Block Cloning can be described as a fast, manual deduplication. ### Description In many ways Block Cloning is similar to the existing deduplication, but there are some important differences: - Deduplication is automatic and Block Cloning is not - one has to use a dedicated system call(s) to clone the given file/blocks. - Deduplication keeps all data blocks in its table, even those referenced just ones. Block Cloning creates an entry in its tables only when there are at least two references to the given data block. If the block was never explicitly cloned or the second to last reference was dropped, there will be neither space nor performance overhead. - Deduplication needs data to work - one needs to pass real data to the write(2) syscall, so hash can be calculated. Block Cloning doesn't require data, just block pointers to the data, so it is extremely fast, as we pay neither the cost of reading the data, nor the cost of writing the data - we operate exclusively on metadata. - If the D (dedup) bit is not set in the block pointer, it means that the block is not in the dedup table (DDT) and we won't consult the DDT when we need to free the block. Block Cloning must be consulted on every free, because we cannot modify the source BP (eg. by setting something similar to the D bit), thus we have no hint if the block is in the Block Reference Table (BRT), so we need to look into the BRT. There is an optimization in place that allows to eliminate majority of BRT lookups that is described below in the "Minimizing free penalty" section. - The BRT entry is much smaller than the DDT entry - for BRT we only store 64bit offset and 64bit reference counter. - Dedup keys are cryptographic hashes, so two blocks that are close to each other on disk are most likely in totally different parts of the DDT. The BRT entry keys are offsets into a single top-level VDEV, so data blocks from one file should have BRT entries close to each other. - Scrub will only do a single pass over a block that is referenced multiple times in the DDT. Unfortunately it is not currently (if at all) possible with Block Cloning and block referenced multiple times will be scrubbed multiple times. - Deduplication requires cryptographically strong hash as a checksum or additional data verification. Block Cloning works with any checksum algorithm or even with checksumming disabled. As mentioned above, the BRT entries are much smaller than the DDT entries. To uniquely identify a block we just need its vdevid and offset. We also need to maintain a reference counter. The vdevid will often repeat, as there is a small number of top-level VDEVs and a large number of blocks stored in each VDEV. We take advantage of that to reduce the BRT entry size further by maintaining one BRT for each top-level VDEV, so we can then have only offset and counter as the BRT entry. Minimizing free penalty. Block Cloning allows to clone any existing block. When we free a block there is no hint in the block pointer whether the block was cloned or not, so on each free we have to check if there is a corresponding entry in the BRT or not. If there is, we need to decrease the reference counter. Doing BRT lookup on every free can potentially be expensive by requiring additional I/Os if the BRT doesn't fit into memory. This is the main problem with deduplication, so we've learn our lesson and try not to repeat the same mistake here. How do we do that? We divide each top-level VDEV into 64MB regions. For each region we maintain a reference counter that is a sum of all reference counters of the cloned blocks that have offsets within the region. This creates the regions array of 64bit numbers for each top-level VDEV. The regions array is always kept in memory and updated on disk in the same transaction group as the BRT updates to keep everything in-sync. We can keep the array in memory, because it is very small. With 64MB regions and 1TB VDEV the array requires only 128kB of memory (we may decide to decrease the region size in the future). Now, when we want to free a block, we first consult the array. If the counter for the whole region is zero, there is no need to look for the BRT entry, as there isn't one for sure. If the counter for the region is greater than zero, only then we will do a BRT lookup and if an entry is found we will decrease the reference counters in the entry and in the regions array. The regions array is small, but can potentially be larger for very large VDEVs or smaller regions. In this case we don't want to rewrite entire array on every change. We then divide the regions array into 128kB chunks and keep a bitmap of dirty chunks within a transaction group. When we sync the transaction group we can only update the parts of the regions array that were modified. Note: Keeping track of the dirty parts of the regions array is implemented, but updating only parts of the regions array on disk is not yet implemented - for now we will update entire regions array if there was any change. The implementation tries to be economic: if BRT is not used, or no longer used, there will be no entries in the MOS and no additional memory used (eg. the regions array is only allocated if needed). Interaction between Deduplication and Block Cloning. If both functionalities are in use, we could end up with a block that is referenced multiple times in both DDT and BRT. When we free one of the references we couldn't tell where it belongs, so we would have to decide what table takes the precedence: do we first clear DDT references or BRT references? To avoid this dilemma BRT cooperates with DDT - if a given block is being cloned using BRT and the BP has the D (dedup) bit set, BRT will lookup DDT entry and increase the counter there. No BRT entry will be created for a block that resides on a dataset with deduplication turned on. BRT may be more efficient for manual deduplication, but if the block is already in the DDT, then creating additional BRT entry would be less efficient. This clever idea was proposed by Allan Jude. Block Cloning across datasets. Block Cloning is not limited to cloning blocks within the same dataset. It is possible (and very useful) to clone blocks between different datasets. One use case is recovering files from snapshots. By cloning the files into dataset we need no additional storage. Without Block Cloning we would need additional space for those files. Another interesting use case is moving the files between datasets (copying the file content to the new dataset and removing the source file). In that case Block Cloning will only be used briefly, because the BRT entries will be removed when the source is removed. Note: currently it is not possible to clone blocks between encrypted datasets, even if those datasets use the same encryption key (this includes snapshots of encrypted datasets). Cloning blocks between datasets that use the same keys should be possible and should be implemented in the future. Block Cloning flow through ZFS layers. Note: Block Cloning can be used both for cloning file system blocks and ZVOL blocks. As of this writing no interface is implemented that allows for ZVOL blocks cloning. Depending on the operating system there might be different interfaces to clone blocks. On FreeBSD we have two syscalls: ssize_t fclonefile(int srcfd, int dstfd); ssize_t fclonerange(int srcfd, off_t srcoffset, size_t length, int dstfd, off_t dstoffset); Even though fclonerange() takes byte offsets and length, they have to be block-aligned. Both syscalls call OS-independent zfs_clone_range() function. This function was implemented based on zfs_write(), but instead of writing the given data we first read block pointers using the new dmu_read_l0_bps() function from the source file. Once we have BPs from the source file we call the dmu_brt_addref() function on the destination file. This function allocates BPs for us. We iterate over all source BPs. If the given BP is a hole or an embedded block, we just copy BP. If it points to a real data we place this BP on a BRT pending list using the brt_pending_add() function. We use this pending list to keep track of all BPs that got new references within this transaction group. Some special cases to consider and how we address them: - The block we want to clone may have been created within the same transaction group as we are trying to clone. Such block has no BP allocated yet, so it is too early to clone it. In this case the dmu_read_l0_bps() function will return EAGAIN and in the zfs_clone_range() function we will wait for the transaction group to be synced to disks and retry. - The block we want to clone may have been modified within the same transaction group. We could potentially clone the previous version of the data, but that doesn't seem right. We handle it as the previous case. - A block may be cloned multiple times during one transaction group (that's why pending list is actually a tree and not an append-only list - this way we can figure out faster if this block is cloned for the first time in this txg or consecutive time). - A block may be cloned and freed within the same transaction group (see dbuf_undirty()). - A block may be cloned and within the same transaction group the clone can be cloned again (see dmu_read_l0_bps()). - A file might have been deleted, but the caller still has a file descriptor open to this file and clones it. When we free a block we have additional step in the ZIO pipeline where we call the zio_brt_free() function. We then call the brt_entry_decref() that loads the corresponding BRT entry (if one exists) and decreases reference counter. If this is not the last reference we will stop ZIO pipeline here. If this is the last reference or the block is not in the BRT, we continue the pipeline and free the block as usual. At the beginning of spa_sync() where there can be no more block cloning, but before issuing frees we call brt_pending_apply(). This function applies all the new clones to the BRT table - we load BRT entries and update reference counters. To sync new BRT entries to disk, we use brt_sync() function. This function will sync all dirty top-level-vdev BRTs, regions arrays, etc. Block Cloning and ZIL. Every clone operation is divided into chunks (similar to write) and each chunk is cloned in a separate transaction. To keep ZIL entries small, each chunk clones at most 254 blocks, which makes ZIL entry to be 32kB. Replaying clone operation is different from the regular clone operation, as when we log clone operation we cannot use the source object - it may reside on a different dataset, so we log BPs we want to clone. The ZIL is replayed when we mount the given dataset, not when the pool is imported. Taking this into account it is possible that the pool is imported without mounting datasets and the source dataset is destroy before the destination dataset is mounted and its ZIL replayed. To address this situation we leverage zil_claim() mechanism where ZFS will parse all the ZILs on pool import. When we come across TX_CLONE_RANGE entries, we will bump reference counters for their BPs in the BRT and then on mount and ZIL replay we will just attach BPs to the file without bumping reference counters. Note it is still possible that after zil_claim() we never mount the destination, so we never replay its ZIL and we destroy it. This way we would end up with leaked references in BRT. We address that too as ZFS gives as a chance to clean this up on dataset destroy (see zil_free_clone_range()). ### How Has This Been Tested? I have a test program that can make use of this functionality that I have been using for manual testing. ### Types of changes - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency) - [ ] Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs\_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv) - [x] Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation) ### Checklist: - [x] My code follows the OpenZFS [code style requirements](https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-conventions). - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. - [x] I have read the [**contributing** document](https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [ ] I have added [tests](https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/tree/master/tests) to cover my changes. - [ ] I have run the ZFS Test Suite with this change applied. - [x] All commit messages are properly formatted and contain [`Signed-off-by`](https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md#signed-off-by).

This thread was posted by one of our members via one of our news source trackers.

View thread on forum

#block

0 727 0

2023-07-06 01:00:36 UTC

Where Next?

View thread on forum

block

Home General Dev>In The News

#block

0 727 0

Last post

ZFS 2.2.0 (RC): Block Cloning merged

CommunityNews

ZFS 2.2.0 (RC): Block Cloning merged

Where Next?

Popular General Dev topics

Wearable Microphone Jamming

Launching Fig

There’s No Such Thing as Clean Code

The overengineered Solution to my Pigeon Problem

LiveKit – open-source, high performance WebRTC infrastructure

LG 28-inch 16:18 DualUp Monitor

A Framework for Prioritizing Tech Debt

X can’t stop spread of explicit, fake AI Taylor Swift images

SLUM: The Shadow Library Uptime Monitor

Knowing CSS is mastery to Front end Development

Other popular topics

Obsidian – a cross platform app to help you create a knowledge base with Markdown files

Which language or framework do you want to learn next?

Bit – A modernized Git CLI written in Go

Poll: Which code editor do you use?

Custom keyboard keycaps

Planck vs Preonic vs Subatomic (Keyboards)

GMK Serika Keycaps - Serika 2 available to order now!

How to install Ruby 3 with ASDF

Do you prefer regular mechanical keyboards or low profile mechanical keyboards and why?

Post your DeepSeek results

Sponsor Spotlight

General Dev>In The News

Latest on Devtalk

We ❤️ helpful members!

Devtalk Sponsors

Categories:

Sub Categories:

Popular Portals

Devtalk Sponsors

We're in Beta